Today, 30th April, The Supreme Court ruled that the twin tests under the PMLA can affect bail, emphasizing the authority of a criminal court. The debate centers on whether bail conditions still apply after a special court acknowledges the offence and the ED’s authority to arrest post-complaint acknowledgment. Legal discourse stems from a previous refusal of pre-arrest bail in a money laundering case.
On Wednesday (24th April): The National Green Tribunal (NGT) criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for not taking action against environmental offenders, stating that it encourages violations of environmental laws. The NGT emphasized that revenue from environmental crimes qualifies as ‘proceeds of crime’ under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), directing the compensation to be used for environmental restoration in affected areas.
On Wednesday (24th April): Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was contested in the Supreme Court, with the agency citing his non-cooperation during the investigation. The ED maintains that Kejriwal’s behaviour warranted his arrest, while the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) accuses the ED of falsehoods and serving the interests of the BJP. Kejriwal is in judicial custody at Tihar jail.
The Supreme Court is set to address 400+ writ petitions on May 1st, challenging penal provisions under five laws. The laws under scrutiny include GST, Customs Act, Companies Act, Black Money Act, and FCRA. Additionally, a bench will address the validity of provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Various pleas question the constitutionality and procedures of these laws.
Yesterday,22nd April, During a court hearing in Delhi, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) faced questions about recording doctor statements for a money laundering case. This pertains to the ongoing ‘Land-for-Jobs’ scam investigation. The ED’s response will clarify legal protocols for obtaining statements from medical professionals in financial crime cases. The court will continue discussions on Amit Katyal’s bail and the scrutiny of his medical condition.
Today, 22nd April, The Delhi High Court set May 15 for hearing Arvind Kejriwal’s challenge to ED summonses related to a money laundering case. Kejriwal’s plea questions the legality of ED’s actions, marking a crucial legal battle. The court granted him time to respond to ED’s reply. Kejriwal argues against PMLA provisions and accuses unfair use for political motivation.
Today, 15th April, The Delhi High Court asked the Enforcement Directorate to provide evidence supporting Tahir Hussain’s plea to dismiss the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case related to the 2020 riots. The court reviewing the maintainability of the plea and scheduled the hearing for September. Hussain’s lawyer will also be allowed to file a response.
A Delhi court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for flawed investigation in a money laundering case. The court summoned the Investigating Officer to explain why penal and disciplinary action should not be recommended. Special Judge Farrukh noted the failure to conduct a fair investigation, as crucial evidence was withheld. The court issued notices for the individuals implicated in the illegal activities.
Today (21st March): The Delhi High Court declined interim bail for CM Arvind Kejriwal in the ED summons case related to the Delhi excise policy. The court set the next hearing for April 22. Kejriwal’s summons coincided with election announcements, leading to arguments about political interference. The ED stressed Kejriwal’s personal capacity. The case stems from allegations of irregularities in the Delhi Excise Policy.