Today, on 9th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Supreme Court stressed that every constitutional power carries an inbuilt duty of reasonableness. “To exercise a constitutional power reasonably is inherent, it need not be superimposed,” Justice Narasimha observed during the Governor’s assent hearing.
Today, on 9th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Kerala told the Supreme Court that Governors must handle legislative Bills “as soon as possible, not as convenient.” Senior Advocate K.K. Venugopal emphasized timely gubernatorial action under Article 200.
Today, on 9th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Karnataka told the Supreme Court that discretionary powers of Governors are constitutionally limited, stressing that ultimate sovereignty lies with the people and governance in a parliamentary democracy functions only through Cabinet responsibility and legislative supremacy.
Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Kapil Sibal representing state of West Bengal tells Supreme Court, “Governor blocking bills makes Constitution unworkable.” The state emphasized that such discretionary powers of the Governor undermine the cabinet form of government and the principles of collective responsibility enshrined in the Constitution.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Karnataka tells Supreme Court that the Governor has only executive power and no legislative powers. Senior Advocate Gopal Subramaniam emphasized that any discretion of the Governor is clearly defined in the Constitution.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, The Supreme Court said that a Governor cannot just act like a postman or behave like a super legislature while examining the constitutional limits of a Governor’s powers under Article 200.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Kapil Sibal told the Supreme Court that a Governor cannot examine the legislative competence of Bills, stressing that any discretion must strictly come from the Constitution and not through arbitrary delays that undermine state legislatures.
Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
Today, on 2nd September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing West Bengal, said that the legislature’s sovereign acts cannot be implemented by the Executive. The Governor cannot withhold bills, and at no stage does the Executive possess legislative authority.
