The High Court rejected a plea seeking permission to use loudspeakers On top of a mosque. It stated that religious places are meant for offering prayers, and the use of loudspeakers cannot be considered a fundamental right. The court emphasized maintaining peace and harmony. This ruling highlights the balance between religious practices and public order.
The Supreme Court on Thursday,(14th Nov) rejected a plea to mandate doctors to inform patients about medication risks, deeming it impractical due to overcrowded pharmacies and doctors’ limited patient consultations. Suggestions for printed forms were dismissed as unfeasible. The court stressed existing responsibilities of manufacturers and pharmacists to provide such information, concluding no legislative gap existed.
![[Youtuber's Video Retweet Case] SC Extended Stay To Kejriwal to Settle Dispute with Complainant in Defamation Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-46-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (13th May): The Supreme Court rejected a plea to remove Arvind Kejriwal as the Chief Minister of Delhi, stating that it is the Lieutenant Governor’s responsibility to address the issue. Both the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court declined to intervene in the matter, emphasizing the non-interference principle and expressing reluctance to be involved in a political dispute.
![[BREAKING] Court Allows CBI to Formally Arrest Arvind Kejriwal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/KEJU.jpg?resize=447%2C363&ssl=1)
![[Delhi Excise Policy Scam] ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail Plea In Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-292.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[BREAKING] Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Sets Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against ED Summons on September 9](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MicrosoftTeams-image-6-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment on Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest in the Delhi excise policy case. The ED seeks to attach AAP properties but raises concerns about the timing due to the upcoming elections, as reported by the Additional Solicitor General. The court is also considering the ED’s request to attach AAP properties.