Jio-Facebook Case: Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with SEBI’s Rs.30 Lakh Penalty on Reliance

Today, On 2nd December, in the Jio-Facebook Case, Supreme Court declines to interfere with SEBI’s Rs.30 lakh penalty on Reliance, holding that the findings raised no substantial question of law. The decision leaves intact SEBI’s action over delayed disclosure of the deal leak.

Manual Scavenging: Supreme Court Fines Delhi PWD Rs.5 Lakh for Engaging Minor Worker in Sewer Cleaning Outside Apex Court Premises

Today, On 18th September, The Supreme Court fined Delhi PWD Rs.5 lakh for employing manual sewer cleaners, including a minor, just outside its premises. The bench strongly criticised the department for violating earlier prohibitions and risking workers’ lives without protective gear.

Supreme Court Freezes Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty on Patanjali, Calls It the ‘Main Person’ in Probe

The Supreme Court Today (Aug 14) stopped the recovery of a Rs 273.5 crore GST penalty on Patanjali Ayurved, agreeing to hear the company’s challenge against the Allahabad High Court order upholding it. The penalty relates to alleged circular trading and wrongful ITC claims.

Supreme Court Rules: “GST Officers Must Give Final Written Orders Even After Penalty Is Paid For Detained Goods”

Supreme Court says GST officials must issue a written reasoned order when goods are seized, even if tax and penalty are paid. Taxpayer’s right to appeal cannot be taken away just because payment is made.

Supreme Court Dismisses Lalit Modi’s Petition to Make BCCI Pay ED Penalty: “Plea Rejected, But Civil Remedy Open”

Today, On The Supreme Court dismissed Lalit Modi’s plea asking BCCI to pay his Rs 10.65 crore FEMA penalty imposed by the ED. However, the bench clarified that he can still seek civil remedies under the law.

Allahabad High Court Rejects Patanjali’s Rs 273.5 Cr GST Penalty Appeal, Says No Criminal Trial Needed

Patanjali Ayurved’s plea against a Rs 273.5 crore GST penalty was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The Court ruled that such penalties are civil in nature and don’t need a criminal trial.

Bombay HC Imposed Rs 1 Lakh Fine on Lalit Modi for ‘Frivolous’ Plea Asks BCCI to Pay Rs 10.65 Crore Penalty

On May 31, 2018, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) imposed significant penalties on several individuals and entities, including Rs 10.65 crore on Lalit Modi. The Bombay High Court later fined Modi Rs 1 lakh for filing a frivolous petition against the BCCI, ruling that no writ could compel the BCCI to pay his penalty.

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ‘Illegal’ Construction Near Rajaji National Park as ‘Prima Facie Sponsored’

The Supreme Court on Friday (20th Dec) addressed a plea alleging illegal construction near Uttarakhand’s Rajaji National Park, questioning its legitimacy. If violations are found, demolition may occur; otherwise, a penalty may be imposed. The court noted concerns about road construction breaching wildlife protection laws, emphasizing the need for compliance and accountability in environmental matters.

“Wasting Court’s Valuable Time”: High Court Rejects Plea To Stay ‘Pushpa 2’ Release, Imposes Penalty On Petitioner

The Telangana High Court dismissed a petition to block the release of Pushpa 2: The Rule, claiming it could glorify illegal activities, similar to its predecessor. Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya found the allegations speculative and criticized the petitioner for wasting judicial time, imposing a penalty while confirming the film’s compliance with regulations.

“Methodology Adopted Totally Unknown to Law”: SC Criticizes NGT’s Revenue-Driven Penalty Scheme for Companies

The Supreme Court criticized the National Green Tribunal for imposing a Rs. 25 crore penalty on Benzo Chem Industrial Private Limited based on revenue without evidence of environmental violations. Justices emphasized that penalty determination must align with legal principles, stressing revenue should not influence penalties and highlighting violations of natural justice in the NGT’s decision.