“Nullifying the Selection Process After Completion Is Like Changing the Rules After the Game, It’s Impermissible”: SC Set Aside Bihar Govt’s Decision to Cancel Junior Engineer Recruitment

The Supreme Court set aside the Bihar government’s cancellation of the 2019 junior engineer selection process, labeling it “impermissible.” The court ordered the Bihar Technical Service Commission to continue appointing candidates based on a fresh select list, emphasizing that altering recruitment rules post-process compromises candidates’ rights. Appointments must be completed within specified timeframes.

[1998 Bihar Murder Case] SC Sentences 2 Accused to Life Imprisonment for Ex-Minister’s Killing

Today, On 3rd October, the Supreme Court sentenced former MLA Munna Shukla and Mantu Tiwari to life imprisonment for their involvement in the 1998 murder of Bihar minister Brij Bihari Prasad. The court partially overturned a 2014 acquittal of other accused, citing insufficient evidence for their involvement while reinstating convictions for the two offenders.

“Highly Objectionable”: Supreme Court Criticized High Court’s Remark On Widow, Make-Up

The Supreme Court criticized the Patna High Court’s comments about a widow and make-up articles in a 1985 murder case, calling them “highly objectionable.” The Supreme Court stated that the remarks lacked sensitivity and evidence, highlighting that no definitive proof linked the victim to the house or supported motive for the crime. All seven accused were acquitted.

SC Collegium Recommends Two Judicial Officers For Appointment as Patna High Court Judges

The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the appointment of two judicial officers, Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh and Ashok Kumar Pandey, as judges of the Patna High Court. This decision follows consultations with eminent Supreme Court judges and input from the Union Department of Justice, confirming the candidates’ integrity and professional reputations.

[Explosions In Narendra Modi Rally] Patna HC Commutes Death Sentences Of 4 Accused To Life Term In 2013 Gandhi Maidan Serial Blasts

The Patna High Court Today (Sept 11) commuted the death sentences of four accused, involved in the 2013 serial blasts case, to life imprisonment. The blasts took place at Patna’s Gandhi Maidan during an election rally being addressed by Narendra Modi who was the BJP’s Prime Ministerial candidate for the 2014 Lok Sabha elections.

Supreme Court Seeks Response From Bihar Govt. on RJD Leader Ram Bali Singh’s Plea Against Bihar Legislative Council Expulsion

The Supreme Court issued a notice to the Bihar Government and Assembly office regarding RJD leader Rambali Singh’s expulsion from the Bihar Assembly. Singh’s petition challenges the decision of the Patna High Court, based on procedural flaws in the complaint against him. The next hearing is scheduled for October 25.

“What Kind of PIL has been Filed?”| Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Constitutionality of GST Amendments

Today(on 2nd September),The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition challenging the constitutionality of the 101st Amendment Act, 2016, which introduced GST. The bench, led by Justice J.B. Pardiwala, upheld the Patna High Court’s earlier decision rejecting the writ petition.

Impersonating Former Chief Justice| Accused Man Moves Supreme Court for Bail 

Yesterday, On 27th August, A 25-year-old man sought bail from the Supreme Court after impersonating the former Patna High Court Chief Justice in 2022. He allegedly deceived the Registrar General and obtained Amazon gift cards. The Supreme Court issued notice on the bail plea, returnable on 30th September, 2024. The incident led to an FIR under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act.

“Are We Now Expected to do a Land Record Officer’s Job?”: SC Dismisses Plea Challenging Construction of Panchayat Building

Today, On 23rd August, The Supreme Court rejected a plea challenging the construction of a Gram Panchayat Bhawan in Bihar, questioning the involvement of the apex court in local administrative issues. The petitioner’s concerns about potential disruptions to the educational environment were dismissed, affirming the importance of local governance and the need for adequate facilities to support it.