Singer Honey Singh visited the Mahakaleshwar Temple to seek blessings as the High Court scheduled a hearing on March 28 regarding a case against him. The controversy stems from allegations that he promoted vulgarity through Bhojpuri songs. A petition was filed accusing him of degrading cultural and moral values through his lyrics. The court will now review the matter to determine further legal action.
Actress Neetu Chandra filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Patna High Court, demanding a complete ban on vulgar Bhojpuri songs. She argues that such content negatively impacts society and makes women uncomfortable watching television at home. Chandra emphasizes the need for cleaner, more respectful entertainment.
The Central Government Today (March 4) confirmed the permanent appointment of Justice Shailesh Pramod Brahme, Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla, and Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain in the Bombay High Court. Justice Manjusha Ajay Deshpande’s term as an additional judge has also been extended for one year.
The Central Government Today (March 4) confirmed four additional judges of the Madras High Court as permanent judges. With this, the court now has 65 judges, leaving 10 vacancies.
The Supreme Court Collegium has suggested the appointment of five advocates as judges of the Calcutta High Court. With 29 vacancies, this decision aims to strengthen the court’s functioning.
The Supreme Court commented that long pending bail cases in Bihar might be the reason for its peace. The Court refused to expedite a trial but allowed the petitioner to apply for bail.
The Supreme Court Collegium recommended making four additional judges of the Madras High Court permanent. This decision was taken in a meeting held on Thursday, as confirmed by an official statement.
The Supreme Court Collegium proposed making three Bombay High Court judges permanent while extending Justice Manjusha Deshpande’s term for one more year.
The Supreme Court has recommended five advocates for appointment as judges of the Patna High Court. This decision was made during the Collegium meeting on February 20.
Patna: The Patna High Court ruled that a father-in-law is not automatically required to provide maintenance to his widowed daughter-in-law under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA). The court stated that such liability arises only if the father-in-law has sufficient income from coparcenary property. The case originated from a Criminal Revision petition filed by a widowed woman seeking financial support from her late husband’s family.
