[BREAKING] LS Polls 2024 | Plea for Re-Polling in Bihar’s Munger Refused by Supreme Court

The Supreme Court Today (May 31st) refused to entertain a plea seeking directions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct re-polling in Munger parliamentary constituency in Bihar in the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections. A Vacation Bench of Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and Prasanna B Varale took exception to the petitioner not approaching Patna High Court first.

Supreme Court Urges Government to Develop Sentencing Framework for Criminal Cases

The Supreme Court of India urged the Centre to develop a comprehensive sentencing policy for criminal offenses to standardize outcomes and reduce disparities. The Court emphasized the importance of this policy, highlighting current inconsistencies in sentencing and the need to uphold fundamental rights. The move aims to enhance judicial fairness and ensure fair trials.

NEET UG Paper Leak| Petition Seeks Cancellation and CBI Probe in Patna High Court

The Patna High Court received a petition demanding the cancellation of the NEET UG exam due to alleged paper leaks. The plea calls for a CBI investigation, citing concerns over exam integrity and student futures. The scandal involves arrests, bribery, and organized gangs. Calls for re-conducting the exam and ensuring fairness grow.

What Happens After Sushil Modi’s Death? | Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi

Sushil Kumar Modi’s passing raises concerns about the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his “Modi surname” remark. Legal experts confirm that Sushil Modi’s heirs can continue the lawsuit. If the family chooses not to proceed, the court may dismiss the case. Indian law allows heirs to pursue defamation cases on behalf of the deceased.

Minimum Marks Criteria in Interview For Bihar Judicial Service: SC Upholds Policy Not Violative Under Article 14

Today (6th May): The Supreme Court of India upheld the minimum marks requirement in Bihar Judicial Services Examination interviews, ruling that it does not violate the right to equality under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The decision came in response to a plea from unsuccessful candidates, emphasizing the importance of maintaining fairness and transparency in the recruitment process.

Patna HC Imposes Fine on Lower Court Judges for Wrongful Conviction

The Patna High Court on 25th April fined lower court judges Rs 100 each for wrongly convicting a man in a dowry harassment case. Sunil Pandit appealed against his conviction and was acquitted by Justice Chaudhuri, who emphasized the duty of courts to carefully examine complaints before proceeding. The fines were to address the petitioner’s suffering due to the lower courts’ approach.

Patna High Court: Clearance for ‘Appointment of Assistant Professors’ in Bihar State Universities

The Patna High Court has permitted the recruitment of assistant professors in Bihar’s state universities, ending a four-year hiatus. The court mandated specific guidelines for creating reservation rosters for each university. The decision ensures subject-wise and university-wise determination of reservation quotas, following a prolonged legal dispute. The Bihar State University Service Commission will promptly resume the appointment process.

Bihar Caste Census: State Justifies Survey in Supreme Court Affidavit

Today, 16th April, The Bihar state government defended its caste census initiative in a recent Supreme Court affidavit, aiming to understand socio-economic conditions for marginalized communities and to enhance policies for disadvantaged groups. The government emphasized adherence to constitutional mandates and outlined various initiatives based on the survey report’s findings, such as quota benefits and educational support.

“Labeling Wife ‘Bhoot’ or ‘Pisach’ Not Deemed Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC”: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court ruled that derogatory terms like “Bhoot” and “Pisach” directed at a wife do not always constitute ‘cruelty’ under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Despite conviction by lower courts, the High Court overturned the decision due to lack of specific evidence and affirmed its authority to rectify miscarriages of justice.