The Supreme Court Today (May 14th) said that it was not convinced by the apology affidavit submitted by Indian Medical Assocation (IMA) President Dr RV Asokan over his comments criticising the Court in an interview.
The Supreme Court Today (May 7th) questioned the Central government’s directive to AYUSH authorities, asking why they were instructed not to act against misleading advertisements under Rule 170 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. The inquiry came during a hearing of a plea filed by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) against an alleged smear campaign by Patanjali Ayurved and its founders Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, targeting the COVID-19 vaccination drive and modern medicine.
![[Patanjali Fake Ads Case] SC Reserves Verdict in Contempt Of Court Against Patanjali](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/patanjali1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[BREAKING] Ramdev, Patanjali Publish New and 'BIGGER' Apology Today | A Day After SC Rap](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-47-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Following a Supreme Court reprimand, Patanjali co-founders Ramdev and Balkrishna issued a new, more prominent public apology in newspapers, acknowledging their non-compliance with court directions and vowing to rectify their mistakes. The apology addresses misleading advertisements and emphasizes their commitment to abide by the court’s instructions. The court scheduled a hearing on April 30 to review the matter.
![[Breaking] Supreme Court Strikes Down Haryana's 5-Marks Reservation in Employment Exams](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-16-1.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
Today, 19th April,The Supreme Court issued notices in response to a petition challenging anti-profiteering measures in India. The petition questions the validity of these measures and their impact on businesses, particularly in the real estate sector. This signals potential legal scrutiny and reflects ongoing debates on pricing policies and consumer protection laws.
Today (9th, April), Yoga guru Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd’s Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna submitted an “unconditional and unqualified apology” to the Supreme Court for exaggerating product claims. The court previously criticized their apologies, emphasizing adherence to legal commitments. The Supreme Court (SC) is set to hear the case on April 10th.
The Supreme Court has requested responses from the Centre and other parties regarding a petition that contests the ruling of the Delhi High Court. This decision upheld the legality of a section in the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, which requires companies to pass on tax savings to consumers by lowering prices. The […]