Unfortunate Trend Of Judges Passing Multiple Orders Before Retirement, Like A Batter Hitting Sixes In The Final Over: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court expressed concern over a growing trend of judges issuing multiple orders just before retirement, questioning judicial discipline. Calling it an unfortunate trend, the Court likened last-minute orders to a batter hitting sixes in final over.

Supreme Court Orders Immediate Treatment for Acid Attack Survivors, Compensation Pending Since 1994

Today, On 3rd December, The Supreme Court has directed states to ensure immediate medical treatment for acid attack survivors, highlighting long delays in relief. The Court noted that compensation for victims has been pending since 1994, urging strict implementation of prior orders.

Google Can Be The Gatekeeper of Indian Internet?: Supreme Court Admits Appeals Against NCLAT Order in Play Store Abuse of Dominance Case

The Supreme Court Today (Aug 8) agreed to hear appeals from Google, CCI, and ADIF over Google’s alleged misuse of dominance in the Android app market. This high-stakes legal battle will be heard in November.

Google Challenges Android Antitrust Verdict in Supreme Court Over CCI and NCLAT Orders: “Dominance Was Leveraged”

Google has moved to the Supreme Court against NCLAT’s ruling supporting CCI’s findings of abuse of dominance in the Android app market. The case involves Google Play billing policies, Google Pay promotion, and a reduced Rs 216.69 crore fine.

Caller ID Spoofing Ban By DoT | Govt Orders Social Media & Apps To Remove Illegal Content

The DoT has ordered social media and app platforms to remove content that helps change Caller ID (CLI) illegally. Platforms must comply by Feb 28, 2025, or face legal action!

Punjab and Haryana High Court: ‘We Ask Media Not To Mention Names of Judges When Reporting Proceedings’

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has requested the media to refrain from naming judges in reports about court proceedings, citing their safety. Similar directives came from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court concerning naming lawyers. Both courts aim to maintain integrity and avoid undue emphasis on individuals in judiciary-related news.

“Only Lawyers Physically or Online Present in Court Can Mark Appearance in Orders”: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court directed that only lawyers who are present in court physically or online during hearings are allowed to mark their appearance for cases (in the record of court proceedings, orders or judgments). Apex Court pointed out that advocates may be entitled to get certain benefits such as allotment of chamber, and senior designations based on their appearances in cases.