Today, 12th April, Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi reaffirmed his government’s commitment to upholding the Constitution during an election rally in Rajasthan. He criticized the Opposition’s claims, emphasizing that even Babasaheb Ambedkar couldn’t revoke the Constitution. Modi accused the Congress of obstructing Ambedkar’s honors and attempting to undermine the Constitution. The BJP distanced itself from an MP’s statement about modifying the Constitution.
The Delhi High Court Today (April 2nd) issued an order directing the opposition alliance to submit its response within seven days to the public interest litigation (PIL) contesting the utilization of the acronym INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) by the alliance.
Today, Kerala CPI MP Binoy Viswam strongly opposes the implementation of the divisive Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), arguing it undermines India’s secular values. He is actively challenging the CAA legally and politically, criticizing its impact on secularism and equality. Viswam is committed to defending the secular fabric of India against such divisive laws.
Adhir Chowdhury of Congress Today questioned the Election Commissioner selection process, expressing dissatisfaction over lack of transparency. He claimed not receiving the shortlisted candidates’ names in advance, hindering informed decision-making. Government sources contradict this, stating that Chowdhury was sent five extensive lists of potential candidates. The incident highlights complexities in high-level governmental appointments, emphasizing the need for transparency.
“Supreme Court Labels ‘INDIA’ Acronym PIL a ‘Publicity Stunt’, Dismisses Plea” The Supreme Court, in a recent hearing, declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition that sought to restrain 26 opposition parties from using the acronym I.N.D.I.A, which stands for Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, for their alliance. The court’s stance was clear […]
