In the aftermath of the Maharashtra election, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut criticized former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud for delays in ruling on disqualification petitions, which he claims led to the Maha Vikas Aghadi’s defeat. He accused Chandrachud of facilitating defections and questioned the legitimacy of the ruling coalition’s success.
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court questioned Ajit Pawar’s NCP faction about their reliance on Sharad Pawar’s name during the Maharashtra elections, emphasizing the need for establishing their identity. The court criticized the confusion caused by using the clock symbol without disclaimers, stressing compliance and the importance of distinguishing between the factions.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court directed the Ajit Pawar-led NCP to publish a disclaimer about the ‘clock symbol’ dispute within 24 to 36 hours, clarifying its legal status. This follows an ongoing legal challenge by Sharad Pawar’s faction regarding symbol usage after the NCP split and Election Commission decisions.
The Supreme Court today (24th Oct) has granted the Sharad Pawar faction of the NCP the right to use their name and symbol while permitting the Ajit Pawar faction to retain the “clock” symbol under specific conditions. The ongoing disputes highlight the need for clarity regarding party representation and symbol allocation amid political turmoil in Maharashtra.
Sharad Pawar’s faction in the NCP filed a Supreme Court petition against Ajit Pawar’s use of the ‘clock’ symbol, asserting it confuses voters and misleads during upcoming elections. They argue for a new symbol to ensure clarity, fair elections, and to prevent exploitation of this confusion amid an ongoing ownership dispute.
Today(on 29th July), The Supreme Court has sought responses from Ajit Pawar and his MLAs on a plea challenging the Maharashtra Speaker’s decision recognizing his group as the legitimate NCP. The court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, acknowledged the need for an expedited hearing due to the assembly’s term ending in November.
Today, On 17th July, Seven FIRs filed against NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad for remarks about Lord Ram will be consolidated at Shirdi, Maharashtra. Awhad’s controversial comments about Lord Ram being non-vegetarian led to charges under Section 295A. The cases, which sparked controversy, will be handled in Shirdi despite Awhad’s efforts to have them transferred elsewhere.
![[Saamana Article on Cash For Votes] Eknath Shinde Demands Immediate Apology from Sanjay Raut| Legal Notice Issued with 3-Day Deadline](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-20-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Eknath Shinde, Maharashtra Chief Minister, sent a legal notice to Sanjay Raut, alleging defamatory statements in Saamna newspaper regarding Lok Sabha elections. Shinde demands an apology within three days, warning of criminal and civil proceedings if not met. Raut responded playfully, as the tension between the two parties continues to escalate.
The Supreme Court Today (April 4th) instructed the Ajit Pawar faction of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) to enhance the visibility of disclaimers in its election advertisements. This directive aims to ensure clarity regarding the use of the NCP’s clock symbol, indicating that it is contingent upon the outcome of a pending court case before the apex court.