![[Chhattisgarh NCP Leader Murder] SC Grants Bail to Two Convicts in 20-Year-Old Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-74-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th November, the Supreme Court granted bail to two convicts in the 2003 politically motivated murder case of NCP leader Ram Avatar Jaggi in Chhattisgarh. This decision followed extensive legal proceedings and a review of the time served. The court’s actions reflect its ongoing reassessment of lengthy cases as hearings continue on related appeals.
![[Land Grabbing Controversy] Court Summons Ajit Pawar’s Party Leader Dhananjay Munde & Others](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Maharashtra court summoned Minister Dhananjay Munde and other Ajit Pawar party leaders over allegations of land grabbing involving a disputed 1.5-acre plot. Sarangi Mahajan, widow of Pravin Mahajan, claims intimidation and coercion led to a fraudulent sale. The case raises significant concerns about land ownership and political influence in the state.
Sharad Pawar’s faction in the NCP filed a Supreme Court petition against Ajit Pawar’s use of the ‘clock’ symbol, asserting it confuses voters and misleads during upcoming elections. They argue for a new symbol to ensure clarity, fair elections, and to prevent exploitation of this confusion amid an ongoing ownership dispute.
Sharad Pawar challenges Ajit Pawar’s NCP faction in Supreme Court over non-compliance with court orders on communication disclaimers. Singhvi stresses urgency, “Changes during elections are unacceptable.” The court declined the request for modification and insisted on compliance until elections end. The dispute arises from a division within the NCP that surfaced in July 2023, leading to factional alignment with Maharashtra’s ruling government.
The Maharashtra Assembly Speaker’s decision dismissing NCP faction disqualification petitions has triggered a legal battle. The Ajit Pawar faction’s plea, contesting the Speaker’s decision, highlights the NCP’s internal strife. With the Bombay High Court set to hear the case, the outcome could significantly impact the party’s future and Maharashtra’s political landscape, posing broader questions about party dynamics and institutional roles.
Sharad Pawar, founder of the NCP, challenges the ECI’s decision recognizing his nephew’s faction as the legitimate NCP in a Supreme Court petition. The ECI’s ruling, favoring Ajit Pawar’s faction based on legislative wing majority, also led to a rebranding of Sharad Pawar’s faction. This legal battle may reshape party politics in India.
In a recent development, the Supreme Court has expressed its displeasure over the delay in adjudication of disqualification petitions against Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and his supporting MLAs. The apex court has warned Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar about the prolonged timeline he has set for hearing these petitions. The petitions, filed by the […]