The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a mosque falls under the definition of ‘Waqf,’ and any disputes regarding such properties must be adjudicated by the Waqf Tribunal. The case involved a dispute over the Madina Zama Masjid, where the petitioners (defendants) claimed ownership of the property. The court emphasized that matters related to Waqf properties […]
Assam ended the 90-year-old tradition of granting a ‘Namaz break’ in the state assembly. AIUDF MLA Rafiqul Islam expressed disappointment, calling it a decision enforced by the ruling majority. He argued that such changes should consider all voices in a democratic setup. The move sparked political debate over religious accommodations in legislative proceedings.
Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Vishnu Shankar Jain presented strong arguments in the Bhojshala case at the Supreme Court of India. He supported his claims with solid facts and important documents. His careful approach and legal knowledge helped bring out key points in the case. This hearing is getting a lot of attention because it involves history and religious beliefs.
![[Gyanvapi Case] 'Utilize Non-Invasive Methodology': SC's 2023 Verdict Boosts Survey Orders for Disputed Sites](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-3-2.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in the Gyanvapi case legitimized surveys of disputed religious sites, providing a precedent for similar cases. The decision, permitting the Archaeological Survey of India to investigate the mosque complex, has incited claims over additional contested worship places, leading to escalating tensions and legal disputes across the country.
Yesterday, On 5th October, the Delhi High Court heard a case regarding a statue of Rani Lakshmi Bai installed at Shahi Idgah Park. The Municipal Corporation assured the court that local sentiments were respected during installation. The court emphasized the need for an amicable resolution and allowed representatives of the opposing committee to inspect the statue’s placement.
Today(30th Aug),The Supreme Court upheld its earlier order requiring the Jalgaon Municipal Council to keep the gates of the Jalgaon Jumma Masjid open for namaz throughout the day. This decision came after the mosque sought to modify the April 19, 2024, order that controversially referred to the site as a “temple.”
The Orissa High Court commuted the death sentence of Sheikh Asif Ali, convicted for the rape and murder of a six-year-old girl, to life imprisonment. The court noted that Asif Ali has been practicing Namaz several times. While acknowledging the heinous nature of the crime, describing it as “horrendous, devilish, and barbaric,” the court emphasized that the case was based on circumstantial evidence and lacked proof of premeditation. Asif Ali, along with Sk Akil Ali, was convicted by the Pocso Court in Jagatsinghpur for the crime committed on November 21, 2022. This decision highlights the complexities involved in adjudicating such serious cases.
Today,23rd April,The ASI requested an additional eight weeks to study the structures at the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar district, Madhya Pradesh. The dispute arises from Hindu reverence of it as a temple, while Muslims see it as a mosque. The court will address the request on April 29. ASI is conducting a comprehensive survey with advanced scientific methods.
A local court in Lucknow, presided over by Special Judge Vivekanand Sharan Tripathi, has recently voiced serious concerns regarding the conduct of some Muslim lawyers who have been leaving court proceedings to offer Namaz, particularly on Fridays. Also read- Lucknow Court Favors Ex-UP Minister In Defamation Case Against MP Sanjay Singh (lawchakra.in) During the hearing […]
