A Kerala court has sentenced 15 individuals, including members of PFI and SDPI, to death for the murder of BJP leader Ranjith Sreenivas. The brutal killing, in front of his family, stemmed from political rivalries. The court’s decision is seen as a deterrent against political violence and emphasizes the judiciary’s commitment to justice.
The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed pleas from eight Hindu-Muslim couples seeking protection for their interfaith marriages under India’s anti-conversion laws. The ruling highlights the legal complexities and challenges faced by such couples and emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to laws concerning religious conversion and marriage in the country.
Supreme Court of India has taken significant action concerning the contentious issue of the Uttar Pradesh government’s ban on halal-certified products. The apex court has issued a formal notice in response to a plea filed by the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind Halal Trust, which contests the validity of this ban. In a move to safeguard the rights and freedoms of those involved, the Supreme Court has also extended interim protection to Mahmood Madani, the chief of Jamiat, along with other key office-bearers of the trust.
![[Breaking] Delhi HC's Justice Amit Sharma Recuses from Umar Khalid's Bail Plea in Delhi Riots Case; Will Hear on July 24](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/14khalid.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court adjourned the bail plea hearing of activist Umar Khalid, incarcerated since September 2020 for his alleged role in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy, to January 31. This decision is in connection with the larger conspiracy case, implicating Khalid and others in the communal violence. The case has seen multiple adjournments and is challenging various provisions of the anti-terror statute.
The Supreme Court intervened in the Kheda flogging case, staying contempt proceedings against four Gujarat police officers who had been sentenced to 14 days’ imprisonment for their involvement in public flogging of Muslim men. The officers appealed the verdict, arguing jurisdictional issues, sparking strong disapproval from the Supreme Court bench. The case raises concerns about police conduct and custodial torture enforcement in India.
The Delhi High Court emphasized informed consent in religious conversions for marriage, issuing guidelines to ensure individuals understand the legal implications and consequences. These include obtaining affidavits, certificates, and providing comprehensive information. The ruling aims to protect individuals’ rights and address the complexities of such cases, promoting justice and fairness in the legal process.
The Supreme Court of India has temporarily halted the survey of the Shahi Idgah land in Mathura, following a plea by the mosque committee. This comes after the Allahabad High Court’s decision to allow the survey, which was contested by the mosque committee. The case continues to be a complex legal and religious battle with far-reaching implications.
Israel defended itself against genocide accusations at the ICJ, refuting South Africa’s claims of genocidal acts in Gaza. Israel emphasized Hamas’ responsibility for civilian casualties and highlighted its efforts to improve the humanitarian situation despite Hamas’ obstacles. The ICJ deliberates on provisional measures, with Germany expressing support for Israel and warning against politicizing genocide charges.
The landmark decision by the Delhi High Court emphasized the value of personal relationships over legal technicalities, quashing a case against Arif Khan, who had eloped with a woman alleged to be a minor. The Court recognized the enduring support of Khan’s wife, their marriage, and their children as significant factors, underscoring the importance of considering human aspects in legal judgments.