Suresh Gopi’s film JSK: Janaki v State of Kerala faced CBFC objections over the use of the name ‘Janaki’. Producers have now agreed to changes for censor clearance.
Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to a senior doctor arrested for sharing edited videos of PM Modi and Amit Shah. The Court said he’s a senior citizen, and his further custody won’t help the investigation.
A 62-year-old man was denied bail by the Allahabad High Court for sharing a Facebook post saying “Pakistan Zindabad”. The court said his act disrespected India’s Constitution and supported terrorism.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail to a college lecturer, Dr. Nasheem Bano, arrested for allegedly hurting Hindu sentiments by sharing a video after the Pahalgam terror attack. The court said forwarding a message alone can’t justify indefinite jail.
The Karnataka High Court Today (May 29) strongly criticized BJP leader N Ravikumar for implying that a woman IAS officer was from Pakistan. The court asked him to apologize officially and submit it on record.
BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay has approached the Supreme Court challenging key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act, raising the question, “Do these changes violate equality & justice?” The plea seeks a review of constitutional validity.
Today, On 21st May, The Central government told the Supreme Court that waqf boards handle secular duties, so adding non-Muslims won’t impact their work. It also said Hindu trusts differ, as they don’t allow non-Hindus as members.
Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.
In the Supreme Court, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi questioned the new Waqf law, asking, “Who asks for proof of religion?” while arguing that the law unfairly targets religious endowments.
Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.
