Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Singhvi expressed concerns that the judiciary might declare the Waqf Bill “unconstitutional.” The bill seeks to address flaws in the previous law and improve the functioning of Waqf boards. It aims to streamline the registration process and enhance transparency. Additionally, it promotes the use of technology for better management of Waqf records.
No FIR can be filed without the Chief Justice of India’s approval, says Amit Shah regarding the Justice Varma case. He emphasized the importance of judicial independence and due process in such matters. The statement comes amid growing debates on legal accountability and executive influence. This highlights the government’s stance on protecting judicial integrity.
The Centre called a meeting of all MPs today to discuss the Waqf Bill ahead of its introduction in Parliament. The government aims to clarify the bill’s provisions amid rising opposition. Officials seek to address concerns and ensure transparency. The discussion comes as debates over the bill gain momentum.
The Nagpur police have sent 17 people to police custody until March 22 in connection with the recent violence over the Aurangzeb tomb issue. The case has created tension in the city, leading to multiple arrests. The police custody of 51 accused, including alleged mastermind Fahim Khan, ends today. All of them will be presented before the court for further legal proceedings. Authorities are keeping a close watch on the situation to prevent further unrest. The court’s decision on their custody will be crucial in handling the case.
Today, On 20th January, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that halal certification is not limited to meat products but is being applied to many other items like cement and water bottles. He expressed shock at this practice and said that agencies charge hefty fees for these certifications. Mehta also pointed out that the total money collected through such certifications runs into several lakh crores, raising serious concerns.
The Supreme Court will hear the plea by Shahi Masjid Idgah’s management on January 15, challenging the Allahabad High Court’s rejection of its petition in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. The case focuses on the “religious character” of the disputed site, with Hindu parties seeking mosque removal, citing violations of the Places of Worship Act.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s roster at Allahabad High Court is updated, effective December 16, limiting him to first appeals from district court orders filed up to 2010. This change follows controversy over his remarks regarding the Muslim community, prompting calls for his impeachment and reassigning sensitive cases to other justices.
Today (10th Dec): The Supreme Court has taken note of remarks made by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court during a December 8 event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s legal cell.
The apex court, on its administrative side, has sought details and particulars from the High Court regarding the matter, which is currently under consideration.
![[VHP Event] NGO Writes To CJI Khanna Seeks ‘In-house’ Inquiry Against Allahabad HC Judge For His Remarks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-11-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Prashant Bhushan, representing the NGO CJAR, criticized Justice Yadav for his comments at a VHP event, claiming they undermine judicial impartiality and erode public trust. The letter requests an in-house inquiry and highlights concerns about the judge’s remarks targeting Muslims, advocating for the Uniform Civil Code, and violating judicial ethics.
![[Gyanvapi Case] 'Utilize Non-Invasive Methodology': SC's 2023 Verdict Boosts Survey Orders for Disputed Sites](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-3-2.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in the Gyanvapi case legitimized surveys of disputed religious sites, providing a precedent for similar cases. The decision, permitting the Archaeological Survey of India to investigate the mosque complex, has incited claims over additional contested worship places, leading to escalating tensions and legal disputes across the country.