The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted a murder suspect, a final-year LLM student, permission to sit for his exams, emphasizing the irreparable harm of denying this opportunity. The court ordered the state to provide security and allowed the student to take the exams at the university upon presenting his identity card.
![[Renukaswamy Murder Case] Actor Darshan Remanded to Judicial Custody Until July 4](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-45-1.png?resize=447%2C338&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 22nd June, Kannada actor Darshan Thoogudeepa, along with three others, was remanded to judicial custody until July 4 in connection with the murder of 33-year-old Renukaswamy, a fan of the actor. Allegedly, Darshan enlisted a fan club member to carry out the murder. The case continues to unfold, with 17 individuals implicated in the murder.
The Supreme Court upheld a Karnataka trial court’s decision to charge Congress MLA Vinay Kulkarni with the murder of BJP worker Yogesh Goudar. The court found evidence of Kulkarni’s involvement and dismissed his petition challenging the charges. The accused had approached the courts multiple times, leading to lengthy trial delays. Kulkarni’s appeal for relief was denied.
Lawrence Bishnoi and 26 others face charges in the Sidhu Moosewala murder case in Punjab. Legal proceedings are underway. The chief suspect, Goldy Brar, remains at large despite his alleged involvement. The accused are charged with murder, attempt to murder, conspiracy, and other offenses. The attack on Moosewala was linked to a previous killing.
Yesterday,18th April,The Kadapa Court temporarily banned discussion of the Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy murder case in the current election campaign to prevent prejudice and maintain legal decorum. The court warned against politicizing the case and urged parties to respect fair legal proceedings. The injunction remains in force until April 30.
Today, 12th April,The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that acquittals can’t be reversed based solely on alternative interpretations, emphasizing the importance of legal standards in reviewing acquittals. Justices Oka and Bhuyan’s bench stated that unless an appellate court deems an acquittal judgment as perverse, it cannot intervene. The court’s decision reinforces the presumption of innocence and highlights burden of proof principles, ultimately acquitting the appellants in a murder case.
The Supreme Court On Tuesday(2nd April) quashed the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision in a murder case, criticizing its hasty rejection of the trial court’s well-founded acquittal. Emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal principles, the ruling highlighted the importance of upholding justice and people’s rights. The accused were acquitted, and the decision serves as a reminder of fair legal processes.
On Monday (2nd April): The Calcutta High Court criticized the state for submitting an additional charge sheet in the murder case against Shah Jahan despite the court’s stay order, warning of potential contempt. The family of the victims accused Shah Jahan, and the court had suspended proceedings. The police’s actions were rebuked, and a potential contempt ruling was mentioned.
The Supreme Court has firmly rejected the juvenile plea of Vinod Katara, involved in a murder case dating back over four decades. The court’s ruling emphasized the paramount importance of the school-issued date of birth certificate in age determination, placing it above other methods such as the ossification test. This decision underscores the judiciary’s stance […]
Today(on 2nd March) The Tis Hazari Court in Delhi has concluded the trial of the Ankit Saxena murder case, with sentencing for three convicts reserved for March 7, 2024. The prosecution seeks maximum punishment while the defense pleads for clemency. The court emphasized the pursuit of truth and justice, reflecting the importance of these values in the judicial process.