The Madhya Pradesh High Court has given the state government six weeks to dispose of toxic waste from the former Union Carbide factory in Bhopal. The court directed the media to avoid spreading misinformation about the disposal process, as public anxiety has surged, prompting protests. The government promised stringent safety measures and transparency to restore trust.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has adjourned hearings on petitions contesting the OBC quota hike, in light of the Supreme Court’s interim stay on these proceedings. The Supreme Court is currently adjudicating nine petitions requesting the transfer of all related cases from the MP High Court. Consequently, the high court hearings have been deferred.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a woman cohabiting with a man for a considerable period is entitled to financial maintenance upon separation, even without legal marriage. This decision, upheld by Justice JS Ahluwalia, sets a precedent for recognizing the rights of women in non-formalized partnerships to seek financial support.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court extended the deadline for the state government to respond to a public interest litigation regarding traffic regulations, including mandatory helmet use for two-wheeler riders. A law student initiated the PIL, and the court rescheduled the hearing to February 19. The state chief secretary chaired the hearing.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has implemented a three-stage scrutiny process for disability certificates to prevent fraud and ensure accountability in public employment. The initiative includes horizontal reservation for Persons with Disabilities, addressing backlogs in appointments and revisiting entitlements for visually impaired individuals. The court also emphasized the need for timely selection processes and technological advancements in the review system.
Madhya Pradesh High Court introduces Hindi translations of bail conditions to improve understanding and compliance. This innovative move aims to ensure clarity in legal proceedings, emphasizing the significance of linguistic accessibility. The court’s directive underscores a commitment to ensuring that legal directives are not only issued but also understood by those directly affected.