The Atala mosque, located in Uttar Pradesh’s Jaunpur, has moved the Allahabad High Court challenging a local court’s May 2024 order that allowed the registration of a suit which claims that the mosque was originally an ancient temple referred to as ‘Atala Devi mandir’. The mosque has challenged a suit pending before a local court in which the plaintiffs have sought a declaration that the disputed property is the ‘Atala Devi Mandir.’ Hearing on Dec 9.
![[BREAKING] Sambhal Mosque Plea Against Survey Order | "Please see that peace and harmony is maintained. We have to be absolutely neutral.": CJI Khanna](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-123.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today (Nov 29) emphasized the need for neutrality and the maintenance of public peace while keeping the petition pending. It has directed the parties to approach the appropriate judicial forum for relief, ensuring that no actions are taken in the trial court proceedings until January 8. The case underscores the sensitivity surrounding religious disputes and the importance of judicial intervention to maintain social harmony.
The Central government has requested the Karnataka High Court to order the removal of a madrasa operating within the protected Jama Masjid in Srirangapatna, citing unauthorized activities. The Waqf Board contends that it owns the property and the madrasa activities are lawful. The next hearing is set for November 20, with significant implications for similar cases.
![[Malegaon Blast] "She Didn't Appear Before the Court as Instructed": Court Issues Fresh Bailable Warrant Against Pragya Singh Thakur](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-13-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Mumbai court issued a new bailable warrant against Pragya Singh Thakur in connection with the Malegaon blast case. The decision follows Thakur’s absence from court proceedings, despite previous orders requiring her presence. The court emphasized the importance of her attendance and took action due to her continued non-compliance. Thakur is one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon bombing case, which remains an ongoing high-profile trial.
Today, On 23rd October, the ASI informed the Delhi High Court that designating Jama Masjid as a protected monument would significantly impact preservation efforts and local regulations. The court expressed reluctance but called for suggestions to enhance management and address encroachments while reviewing PILs concerning its protection status and historical significance.
The Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two men, Keerthan Kumar and Sachin Kumar, who were accused of insulting religious beliefs by shouting “Jai Shri Ram” inside a mosque. The court ruled that this act did not “outrage the religious feelings of any class.” The two men, from Dakshin Kannada district, had been charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 295A, 447, and 506, following a complaint lodged in connection with the incident that occurred in September last year. As per the complaint, the two had entered a local mosque one night in September last year and shouted “Jai Shri Ram.”
![[Sanjauli Mosque Case] "No Idea Who Constructed The Additional Four Floors": Waqf Board Claims Ownership as Court Questions Expansion](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-18-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 7th September, The Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board claimed ownership of the land where a mosque in Sanjauli Colony is located but stated it had “no idea who constructed the additional four floors.” Meanwhile, local residents filed an application to become a party in the case, claiming the land belongs to the state government’s revenue department. The issue will be further discussed in the next hearing set for October 5. Two Hindu organizations protested for the mosque’s demolition, labeling it illegal, and the matter stirred debate in the Vidhan Sabha. Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu emphasized respect for all religions and peaceful protests, but emphasized that no one would be permitted to take the law into their own hands.
Today, On 4th September, The Muslim community appealed to the Supreme Court against an Allahabad High Court ruling that upheld the maintainability of lawsuits concerning the Shahi Idgah mosque dispute. The case involves legal challenges over the ownership and status of the mosque, which shares proximity with the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura. The upcoming Supreme Court decision will shape the future legal proceedings and negotiations between the involved parties.
![[Demolition Row] Delhi HC asks Authorities to Grant 1 month for Vacating Mosque Premises](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.png?resize=447%2C300&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court has granted the caretaker of a mosque and madarsa in Hazrat Nizamuddin one month to vacate the premises before its scheduled demolition. This decision comes after the petitioner’s request for sufficient time to seek legal remedies. The court ordered authorities to allow the caretaker to vacate the site within the specified period.
The Supreme Court Today (1 March) has agreed to hear an appeal from the Gyanvapi Management Committee challenging an Allahabad High Court decision deeming lawsuits for the “restoration” of a temple, where a mosque currently stands in Varanasi, as maintainable. Both sides have filed petitions and the legal battle continues.