Allahabad High Court dismisses urgent plea by Sambhal mosque committee, refusing to stay demolition of mosque, marriage hall, and hospital. The court noted the structures were allegedly built on government property, prompting authorities to proceed with removal.
The Supreme Court has set a two-week deadline for both parties involved in the dispute over a well near a mosque in Sambhal to respond. Senior Advocate Ahmadi clarified that the well is covered and used for religious purposes. The Chief Justice suggested they resolve the issue through discussion, highlighting the need for cooperation.
The Bombay High Court criticized the Thane civic body for delaying the demolition of an illegal mosque, rejecting its reasons. The court said that in a democratic country, no person or group can go against the law. It told the authorities to take quick action and follow the rules. The judgment highlights the need to strictly follow the law without any exceptions.
Today, On 28th February, The Allahabad High Court ruled that no painting will be done at the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, allowing only cleaning of the premises. The decision came after the ASI inspected the site and found no need for painting. The Muslim side had requested painting before Ramadan, but the Hindu side opposed it, citing concerns over evidence tampering. The court’s ruling brings relief to the Hindu side while the Muslim side may present further arguments in the next hearing.
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a mosque falls under the definition of ‘Waqf,’ and any disputes regarding such properties must be adjudicated by the Waqf Tribunal. The case involved a dispute over the Madina Zama Masjid, where the petitioners (defendants) claimed ownership of the property. The court emphasized that matters related to Waqf properties […]
The High Court rejected a plea seeking permission to use loudspeakers On top of a mosque. It stated that religious places are meant for offering prayers, and the use of loudspeakers cannot be considered a fundamental right. The court emphasized maintaining peace and harmony. This ruling highlights the balance between religious practices and public order.
The Supreme Court will hear the mosque committee’s plea regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute on March 2025, after previously deferring it. The Allahabad High Court ruled the site’s religious character needs evidence, affecting the legal context of the 1991 Places of Worship Act. The case’s outcome may influence similar disputes.
The Supreme Court will hear the plea by Shahi Masjid Idgah’s management on January 15, challenging the Allahabad High Court’s rejection of its petition in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. The case focuses on the “religious character” of the disputed site, with Hindu parties seeking mosque removal, citing violations of the Places of Worship Act.
The Supreme Court Today (Dec 16) sought the response of the Karnataka government on how the accused who allegedly shouted “Jai Shri Ram” inside a mosque in the State were identified. A Bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Sandeep Mehta asked whether CCTV or any other evidence was checked before ascertaining the identity of the accused. “How were the respondents identified. Did you see CCTV and made the accused party,” the Court asked.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on Monday (Dec 16) challenging the Karnataka High Court’s decision to set aside criminal proceedings against two men accused of raising ‘Jai Shri Ram’ slogans inside a mosque in Karnataka. The case stems from a September 2023 incident at the Badriya Juma Masjid in Dakshina Kannada, where two men allegedly entered the mosque premises, chanted ‘Jai Shri Ram’, and threatened members of the Muslim community, stating they “will not let Bearys (or Byari, a Muslim community) live in peace.”