Today, On 9th April, DMK leader and Tamil Nadu minister V. Senthil Balaji told the Supreme Court that becoming a minister did not break any bail rules in his money laundering case. He said it is his right to hold a political post under Article 21 of the Constitution. Balaji also questioned why his bail was being challenged. He said the move seemed politically motivated.
Today, On 7th April, The Supreme Court has refused to hear the Enforcement Directorate’s plea against the bail granted to a close aide of Lalu Prasad Yadav. This case is linked to the alleged Railways land-for-jobs scam. The ED wanted to cancel the bail but the court did not agree. Now, the aide will continue to stay out on bail.
Ranchi: The special PMLA court in Ranchi on Friday rejected the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) plea to bar IAS officer Pooja Singhal from receiving a government posting, providing her significant relief in the money laundering case linked to the MGNREGA scam. After hearing arguments on Monday, the court reserved its verdict, which was delivered on Friday.
Today, On 13th February, The Delhi High Court issued a notice on Mandoli Jail’s plea challenging permission for Sukesh Chandrashekhar to wear a wristwatch. The jail authorities argue against allowing him to keep the watch inside the facility. This legal move adds to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the high-profile inmate. The court’s decision could set a precedent for prison regulations on personal belongings.
Today, On 13th February, The High Court sought Amanatullah Khan’s response to the Enforcement Directorate’s plea in a money laundering case. Khan, an AAP leader, is under investigation for alleged financial irregularities, with the ED urging the court to take strict action based on its findings. This development adds to the ongoing legal challenges faced by the politician.
A Delhi court exempted Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Durgesh Pathak from personally attending a hearing in the excise policy case due to their election campaigning. The case, now postponed to February 3, 2025, involves corruption allegations in the implementation of the excise policy. The CBI and ED are investigating these charges for possible money laundering.
The Supreme Court emphasized the need for a clear legal framework to prevent courts from recalling orders without hearing the parties involved. It stated that such actions must adhere to the principles of natural justice. Courts are also obligated to provide valid reasons when deciding to withdraw an order. The ruling aims to enhance transparency and accountability in judicial processes.
The Supreme Court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for conducting a 15-hour interrogation without providing any breaks, calling it inhumane. The court expressed concern over the treatment of the individual involved, emphasizing the importance of humane practices in legal processes. This rebuke highlights the need for adherence to basic rights during interrogations.
Today, On 20th December, The Supreme Court expressed concerns about Senthil Balaji’s bail, questioning the Tamil Nadu government about its impact on the victims. The court asked, “What will happen to the victims if he remains a cabinet minister?” It has requested details about the number of victims and the cases filed against Balaji. This comes after a plea was filed to cancel his bail.