The Supreme Court of India emphasized the right to dissent and freedom of speech, stating that criticizing government actions is not a crime. The court urged law enforcement agencies to understand and respect citizens’ rights to express dissent, stressing the need to evaluate statements based on their impact on reasonable individuals, rather than hypersensitive interpretations.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has temporarily allowed the Indian National Congress to access its frozen bank accounts while subject to a lien imposed by the Income Tax Department. The decision follows the party’s disclosure of the account freeze, citing it as an attack on democracy. This milestone highlights the delicate balance between financial scrutiny and political freedom.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed a defamation case filed by Gujarat University against AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh related to comments about PM Modi’s academic degrees. This ruling follows a series of legal battles involving privacy rights, freedom of speech, and the role of educational institutions in certifying leaders’ credentials, drawing public attention and scrutiny.
The Delhi High Court’s recent ruling declared that retweeting defamatory content constitutes an act of defamation. The decision in the case involving Arvind Kejriwal and Dhruv Rathee sets a precedent for online behavior and accountability of public figures, emphasizing the need for caution and responsibility in social media interactions.
Arvind Kejriwal faces non-compliance with ED summonses tied to the Delhi Excise Policy scandal. Money laundering and corruption allegations have emerged, prompting investigations by CBI and ED. The case revolves around irregularities in the excise policy, with accusations of conspiracy and illicit financial flows. ED’s actions mark a critical point in the high-stakes investigation.
The Gujarat High Court, under Justice Hasmukh Suthar, reserves order in the defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal and his associate filed by Gujarat University, centered on alleged defamatory remarks about PM Modi’s degree disclosure. Arguments revolved around the impact on university’s reputation and the need for public perception alignment. Verdict expected on February 16.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a substantial allocation of Rs. 800 crores for the expansion of the Supreme Court during its Diamond Jubilee celebrations. This marks a pivotal moment in Indian judiciary, reflecting the government’s commitment to strengthening legal institutions. The event also saw the launch of citizen-centric digital initiatives, promising a more accessible and efficient justice system.
The Supreme Court has paused the defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh, linked to the controversy over PM Modi’s educational qualifications. This comes after Gujarat High Court’s ruling and subsequent appeal by Kejriwal. The case involves the use of the RTI Act for political purposes, prompting a significant legal and political discourse.
The Calcutta High Court temporarily suspended legal proceedings regarding an FIR against Enforcement Directorate (ED) officers, following a violent raid at a Trinamool Congress leader’s house. The court also dismissed a petition seeking investigation by NIA or CBI into the incident. BJP staged a protest, while the Trinamool leader remains elusive.