New Delhi, Feb 19 – The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of having dedicated spaces for child care and infant feeding in public buildings. It has directed state governments to ensure such facilities are available to support mothers and young children.
The Supreme Court today (6th Dec) has issued a notice regarding a petition seeking protections for Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) members in private companies against arbitrary actions and retaliation. The petition argues that the lack of safeguards violates constitutional rights and calls for ICC members to be classified as public servants, ensuring their independence and safety.
The Supreme Court criticized the Indian government for failing to implement prior directives aimed at addressing sex trafficking. Despite a 2015 order to establish a dedicated investigative body and draft comprehensive legislation, no significant action has been taken, highlighting ongoing concerns about ineffective measures against the issue.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud highlighted the detrimental effects of child marriage, stressing the need for dedicated Child Marriage Prohibition Officers (CMPOs) to enact prevention measures effectively. The Supreme Court mandated measures such as exclusive CMPO appointments, public reporting portals, and fast-track courts to enhance enforcement, protect minors, and ultimately uphold children’s rights in India.
![[Right to Privacy] Kolkata Rape & Murder Case| Plea in Supreme Court to Shield Victim's Identity](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-96-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court regarding the rape and murder of a female trainee doctor in Kolkata, seeking to protect the victim’s identity from being shared on social media. Complainants argue that the dissemination of her photo and family details is damaging their reputation. The case is scheduled to be heard on August 20.
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Police to immediately investigate missing children cases upon receiving a complaint, eliminating the previous 24-hour waiting period. Justices Prathiba M Singh and Amit Sharma stressed adherence to the Ministry of Women and Child Development’s SOP for prompt action. The move aims to enhance efficiency in dealing with such sensitive cases.
Today(on 8th July),The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking menstrual leave and advised the Centre to collaborate with stakeholders and states to formulate a model policy. While recognizing the potential of menstrual leave to increase women’s workforce participation, the Court emphasized the need for a balanced approach to avoid unintended consequences and suggested involving the Ministry of Women and Child Development.