Today, On 13th December, the Supreme Court rejected a PIL regarding voting rights for expatriate citizens, stating it lacked jurisdiction to compel Parliament. Petitioner Savya Sachi Krishnan Nigam highlighted a stalled Election Commission proposal from 2020. The court permitted him to withdraw the petition, suggesting alternative forums for the issue.
Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal highlighted the importance of constitutional awareness at the 3rd regional Hamara Samvidhan, Hamara Samman event at IIT Guwahati. The initiative emphasized Assam’s contributions to the Indian Constitution, particularly by women members. The event featured the launch of relevant products aimed at making legal concepts accessible, celebrating the Constitution’s impact and rights awareness.
![[Stubble Burning] "We are Considering Doubling the existing Compensation Matrix, which is Based on the Extent of Land Holdings": Environment Ministry](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-13-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Environment Ministry is contemplating revising penalties for stubble burning, potentially increasing fines and compensation for farmers. Discussions with the Law Ministry aim to expedite changes without public consultation, prompted by Supreme Court criticism of past methods. Current regulations impose fines based on land size, amid worsening air quality during stubble burning season.
The Supreme Court today has sought the Central Government’s response on a PIL challenging the exclusion of single unmarried women and transgender persons from the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. Justice Nagarathna emphasized the need to handle this case separately, as it addresses specific issues for transgender and single women. Dr. Aqsa Shaikh argues that the exclusion violates constitutional rights.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the appointment of seven judges, dismissing a petition against the appointments. The court found no merit in the arguments presented, reinforcing the validity and lawfulness of the judicial appointments. The Division Bench rejected the challenge based on various grounds, including lack of advertisement and representation, stating that the appointment process adhered to constitutional procedures.
Today (1st May): The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the Centre in relation to a plea from the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) calling for the expansion of the High Court building. The plea underlines the need for more space to cater to the court’s growing requirements, emphasizing the necessity for additional courtrooms, lawyers’ chambers, and essential infrastructure facilities. The Court has highlighted the challenges faced in expanding the premises and stressed the urgency of obtaining adjacent land for the expansion. The plea also addresses the congestion and inconvenience caused by inadequate parking space in the vicinity. The expansion and modernization of the Delhi High Court are crucial to meet the escalating demands of the judicial system and ensure the efficient delivery of justice.