Actor Ajaz Khan Moves Bombay HC Seeking Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case Over “Promise of Marriage” Allegation

Actor Ajaz Khan has approached the Bombay High Court seeking anticipatory bail after Charkop police filed an FIR accusing him of repeatedly having sexual relations with a woman under the false promise of marriage.

Supreme Court Refuses to Quash FIRs Against Two for Praising Afzal Guru, Criticising Judges: “Language Used by Petitioners Is Highly Objectionable”

Today, On 29th April, Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against two accused of praising Afzal Guru, criticising judges. However, it allowed all FIRs to be clubbed and transferred to a Madurai court for a joint trial.

CM Atishi Defamation Case || ‘Special Judge Acted Like Political Analyst, How Can She Be a Whistleblower?’: Delhi High Court

During a defamation case against CM Atishi, the complainant’s counsel argued before Justice Vikas Mahajan that the special judge acted like a political analyst. He sought a stay on the judge’s remarks, claiming they unfairly portrayed Atishi as a whistleblower. The counsel contended that her statements were “per se” defamatory. The Delhi High Court was urged to intervene and review the observations.

Remarks Against Samajwadi Party Founder Mulayam Singh Yadav || Defamation Case Filed Against Mahant Raju Das 

Mahant Raju Das, a priest from Hanuman Garhi, is facing a defamation case for his comments about Mulayam Singh Yadav. He reportedly posted on X, suggesting harmful actions against a statue of Yadav placed in a camp supported by SP workers at the Maha Kumbh. His remarks have led to legal action and public criticism, creating tension around the issue. Authorities are looking into the matter as it gains attention.

Breaking || Asaram Bapu Granted Interim Bail by Rajasthan High Court Until March 31 For Medical Treatment In 2013 Murder Case

Today, On 14th January, The Rajasthan High Court granted interim bail to Asaram in the 2013 rape case, citing health grounds. The bail will remain in effect until March 31, 2025. This decision follows a similar order previously issued by the Supreme Court. Asaram, who has been serving a life sentence, sought relief due to his deteriorating health.

Atul Subhash Suicide | ‘Where Is Atul’s Son?’: Supreme Court Hears Nikita Singhania’s Lawyer

Today, On 7th January, The Supreme Court is hearing the case of Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old who died by suicide in December. Atul had accused Nikita Singhania and her family of harassment through false cases, causing immense pressure on him and his parents. During the hearing, Nikita’s lawyer responded to questions about the whereabouts of Atul’s son. The case continues to gather significant public and legal attention.

Atul Subhash – Similar Case: Famous Cafe Owner Dies By Suicide Amid Divorce Dispute, Family Alleges 59-Minute Harassment Recording

A 40-year-old Delhi businessman, Puneet Khurana, was found dead at his home in a suspected suicide amid an ongoing divorce dispute. His family alleges harassment by his wife and her family, citing a 59-minute video recording left by Puneet detailing the ordeal. Police are investigating the case, and the body has been sent for post-mortem examination. The incident mirrors a recent similar case in Bengaluru.

“Don’t You Realize This Is Being Live-Streamed?”: SC Warns Advocate To Maintain Courtroom Decorum

The Supreme Court reprimanded lawyers for disruptive behavior during a hearing involving Advocate Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal, emphasizing the necessity of professional conduct in live-streamed sessions. Justice Surya Kant warned of serious consequences, including license suspension, for continued misconduct, highlighting the importance of courtroom decorum and accountability.

‘Remo D’Souza’s Plea to Quash Cheating Case’: SC Seeks UP Govt’s Response

Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court requested a response from the Uttar Pradesh government regarding a petition by choreographer Remo D’Souza, who seeks to quash a 2016 cheating case against him. The case, linked to a failed investment promise, highlights critical legal issues that may impact future entertainment industry regulations.