The family of a 10-year-old spiritual orator, “Bal Sant Baba,” has filed a complaint in a Mathura court against seven YouTubers for allegedly trolling and mocking the child. The complaint claims emotional distress, privacy violations, and accuses the YouTubers of generating anti-Hindu content for profit. The family seeks a First Information Report for various offenses, citing lack of police action.
![[Krishna Janmabhumi-Shahi Idgah Dispute] 'Muslim Side Gets A Shock': Allahabad HC Dismisses A Recall Application Filed Against Its January 2024 Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-12-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd October, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the Muslim side’s request for separate hearings in the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah dispute, allowing all cases to be heard together. The decision streamlines the legal process, with key issues to be addressed in the next hearing on November 8.
Today, On 30th September, The Allahabad High Court has scheduled the next hearing for the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute on October 16. This case involves claims over land in Mathura, disputed between a temple and mosque. Key issues include the historical significance of the site and legal amendments from the Hindu litigants concerning claims of ownership.
Today, On 17th September, The Supreme Court requested clarification from the Muslim side in the Shahi Idgah mosque dispute regarding the filing of an appeal in the High Court. The legal battle involves a land dispute claimed by the Hindu community. The court aims to ensure a proper judicial process. The next hearing is scheduled for November 4.
Today, On 4th September, The Muslim community appealed to the Supreme Court against an Allahabad High Court ruling that upheld the maintainability of lawsuits concerning the Shahi Idgah mosque dispute. The case involves legal challenges over the ownership and status of the mosque, which shares proximity with the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura. The upcoming Supreme Court decision will shape the future legal proceedings and negotiations between the involved parties.
The Allahabad High Court has directed the district administration to ensure safety at the Banke Bihari temple in Mathura, assigning responsibility for law and order during the festival. The court has also ordered that live streaming be restricted to within the temple to manage crowd control and prevent overcrowding.
![[Mathura Temple-Mosque Dispute] Hindu Litigants File Caveat in Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-20-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th August, Hindu litigants filed a caveat in the Supreme Court regarding the Mathura temple-mosque dispute to ensure their participation in any future hearings. This comes after the Allahabad High Court dismissed a plea challenging the maintainability of 18 cases related to the dispute. The legal battle holds potential implications for the interpretation of the Places of Worship Act in India.
The Allahabad High Court has set the next hearing for August 12 in the Krishna idol dispute. The court granted the Archaeological Survey of India one week to respond to a plea for surveying the Agra mosque. The case involves multiple petitions regarding the disputed Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah site and ongoing legal discourse.
Today, On 7th May, The Allahabad High Court emphasized the impact of the Waqf Board in the Shahi Idgah dispute, addressing property ownership and religious rights. The case presents broader societal debates on religious sites and legal interpretations, shaping discussions on cultural heritage and communal harmony in India. The involvement of the Waqf Board and the court’s ruling add complexity to the matter, creating anticipation for the Supreme Court’s decision.
![[Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute] Temple is a Protected Monument Under 1958 Act, Hindu Side Tells HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-35.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Hindu side asserts that the deity was not involved in the compromise or court decree in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute at the Allahabad High Court. They argue against the applicability of the Waqf Act and emphasize the property’s historical and religious significance. The legal battle continues.