The Supreme Court will hear the mosque committee’s plea regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute on March 2025, after previously deferring it. The Allahabad High Court ruled the site’s religious character needs evidence, affecting the legal context of the 1991 Places of Worship Act. The case’s outcome may influence similar disputes.
The Supreme Court will hear the plea by Shahi Masjid Idgah’s management on January 15, challenging the Allahabad High Court’s rejection of its petition in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. The case focuses on the “religious character” of the disputed site, with Hindu parties seeking mosque removal, citing violations of the Places of Worship Act.
Akshita Upadhyay, a 20-year-old law student at Amity University, died by suicide in her hostel room, leaving an apology note for her parents. The tragic incident, discovered by her roommate and staff, raises concerns about mental health support in educational institutions, highlighted by previous similar cases involving student suicides.
In 2024, India’s Supreme Court dealt with numerous landmark rulings, focusing on personal liberty, places of worship disputes, and electoral reforms. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna emphasized efficiency, reforming case backlogs. Notable cases included prohibitions on religious site surveys, striking down electoral bonds, and addressing environmental pollution. The court’s decisions significantly influenced legal frameworks and societal issues.
Abhinav Arora, a 10-year-old spiritual content creator from Delhi, is involved in a legal case against YouTubers allegedly trolling him. His advocate revealed they received serious threats linked to the Lawrence Bishnoi group. Family members expressed concern for his safety, emphasizing his innocence amid ongoing social media campaigns against him.
The Supreme Court of India expressed concerns over the exploitation of temple administration in Uttar Pradesh, particularly regarding advocates appointed as receivers who might delay litigation for personal gain. The Court directed the Principal District Judge of Mathura to report on ongoing temple litigation, emphasizing swift resolutions and better management of temple affairs.
Yesterday, On 3rd December, the Budaun Mosque dispute continued as the Masjid Committee argued that the case violates the Places of Worship Act, 1991, amidst claims by the Hindu Mahasabha that the mosque was built over a temple. The court has scheduled further hearings for December 10 to finalize arguments from both sides.
Today, On 29th November, the Supreme Court issued contempt notices to Uttar Pradesh officials for illegally felling 454 trees on Vrindavan Road. The Court mandated that permitted tree-felling must occur only between 6 PM and 8 AM. A halt to further tree felling was ordered, highlighting the need for adherence to judicial directives.
Today, On 29th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea from the mosque committee on December 9 regarding the Mathura Shahi Idgah complex dispute. The case revolves around ownership and religious significance, with Hindu claims asserting the mosque was built on Lord Krishna’s birthplace. The court’s decision could impact future religious site disputes.
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in the Gyanvapi case legitimized surveys of disputed religious sites, providing a precedent for similar cases. The decision, permitting the Archaeological Survey of India to investigate the mosque complex, has incited claims over additional contested worship places, leading to escalating tensions and legal disputes across the country.
