The Supreme Court of India ruled that the electoral bonds scheme violated the right to information and free speech, dismissing a review petition against its earlier decision. The scheme’s anonymity favored the ruling party and undermined accountability. The Court mandated disclosure of all related financial details by the State Bank of India and the Election Commission.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (23rd Jan) expressed its dissatisfaction when a lawyer requested an adjournment in a criminal case. The Bench, comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra, highlighted the prolonged incarceration of the lawyer’s client, emphasizing the need for prompt justice.
NEW DELHI: On January 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a writ petition that sought the establishment of a dedicated Ministry for senior citizens. The petition, filed by Advocate G Priyadharshi, a lawyer and social worker, was withdrawn after the Court allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the relevant government ministries instead.
The Supreme Court has agreed to review audio recordings allegedly implicating Manipur Chief Minister N Biren Singh in communal violence between the Meitei and Kuki communities. The recordings suggest his involvement in promoting insurgency and allowing arms looting. The court seeks verification of the recordings’ authenticity amid opposing views on the ongoing investigation.
The Supreme Court ruled that government entities cannot include clauses for unilateral arbitrator appointments in public-private contracts, as these violate Article 14 of the Constitution, undermining fairness. The decision, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, applies to three-member arbitration panels, emphasizing equal treatment and impartiality in the arbitration process.
On November 9, 2024, a ceremonial bench will honor CJI D.Y. Chandrachud on his final working day, marking his impactful tenure focused on judicial transparency, inclusivity, and technological advancement. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, his successor, is expected to continue these reforms while addressing current judicial challenges. Chandrachud’s legacy will shape future judicial practices.
The Supreme Court today (21st Oct) has refused to stay the ongoing Telangana Public Service Commission exam for 563 Grade-I posts, citing potential chaos if postponed. This decision follows concerns over a disputed quota policy raised by advocate Kapil Sibal. The exams started on October 21 and will run until October 27, with around 31,383 candidates participating.
The Supreme Court of India, today (21st Oct)led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, dismissed a petition by Dr. SN Kundra aimed at replacing “Hindutva” with “Bharatiya Samvidhanatva.” The court deemed the plea a “complete abuse of the process,” reflecting hesitation to alter foundational political concepts, despite concerns over religious nationalism’s impact on governance.
The Supreme Court, today (20th Sept) led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, dismissed SpiceJet’s appeal against a Delhi High Court ruling requiring the airline to ground three aircraft engines due to unpaid dues. The High Court upheld that SpiceJet’s default violated a payment arrangement, emphasizing the urgency to protect the lessors’ interests.
The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, plans to hear Google LLC’s arguments on alleged anti-competitive practices in the Android market over five to six days. Both Google and the Competition Commission of India challenge a previous mixed ruling from the NCLAT, which upheld a significant fine against Google.
![[BREAKING] President's Rule Imposed in Manipur After CM N Biren Singh Resigns](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Manipur-violence_-Supreme-Court-to-examine-whistleblower-tapes-against-CM.jpeg?resize=447%2C338&ssl=1)
![[Quota Policy Controversy] ‘There will be Chaos’: SC Refuses to Stay Ongoing Grade-I Posts Mains Exam in Telangana](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/SC-refuses-to-stay-ongoing-Grade-I-posts-exam-in-Telangana.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[Anti-Competitive Practices in the Android Mobile Device] "Arguments May Take 5-6 days": Google LLC Tells SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2024-09-19T171142.556.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)