The Madras High Court granted bail to temple activist Rangarajan Narasimhan in two cases, including one involving a secretly recorded phone conversation. The court found inadequate grounds for custodial interrogation and noted that derogatory remarks against women did not meet legal harassment definitions. Narasimhan must avoid contacting certain individuals and delete offensive content.
The Supreme Court scolded the West Bengal government for challenging an undertrial’s bail after four previous rejections, warning against further provocations. The accused, Rajdeep Roy, had been in custody for over three years for alleged misappropriation of rice worth Rs. 3 crore. The Court ultimately dismissed the state’s appeal, emphasizing the importance of respecting personal liberty in judicial processes.
In a shocking incident at a Bhilwara courtroom Today (May 27th), the accused-Ismail alias Pondiya, in custody hurled his Slipper at the magistrate during a hearing. The courtroom was thrown into chaos following the suspect’s outburst, which was apparently triggered by frustration over delays in his case proceedings.
Today, On 1st May The Supreme Court emphasized the need for comprehensive and clear chargesheets, containing robust evidence, to ensure fairness and transparency in legal proceedings. The evidence should be sufficient to establish the alleged offense and provide a fair trial for both the accused and the prosecution. This ruling aims to streamline the legal process and protect the rights of all parties involved.
In Hindaun, Rajasthan, an 18-year-old Dalit gang rape survivor accuses a magistrate of forcing her to undress under the guise of examining her injuries. The incident sparked widespread outrage, leading to an FIR against the magistrate under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Rajasthan High Court has ordered an investigation. Women’s groups and human rights organizations have expressed grave concern over the incident, prompting a thorough examination by authorities.
On wednesday (6th of March): The Kerala High Court emphasized that being appointed as an advocate commissioner is an honor, not simply a commercial endeavor. The court criticized a young lawyer’s misconception that the role was purely for monetary gain. It stressed the need for the bar and the bench to guide and nurture young legal professionals for the integrity of the legal system.
The Supreme Court expressed strong disapproval of the Gujarat police and a magistrate for remanding an accused despite anticipatory bail. Justices sought Gujarat government and police response and impleaded the Gujarat High Court. The incident highlights the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and judicial accountability, emphasizing the role of higher judicial academies in training legal professionals.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a Judicial Magistrate cannot consider a supplementary charge-sheet without new evidence. The decision highlighted concerns over reliance on private lab reports and emphasized the need for fresh evidence in criminal proceedings. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside previous orders and reinforcing standards of investigation and judicial scrutiny.
In a recent development, the Supreme Court of India has issued a contempt notice to a magistrate and police officers in Gujarat for violating its order. This action follows the remand of a man to police custody, which contradicted an interim anticipatory bail order previously issued by the Supreme Court. Also read-Supreme Court Stresses Need […]