You Are Misusing Your Liberty By Making Reels And Videos: Supreme Court Rejects Savukku Shankar’s Challenge To Madras HC Bail Terms

Supreme Court refused to interfere with bail conditions imposed by the Madras High Court on YouTuber-journalist Savukku Shankar, upholding interim bail in an assault and extortion case, as Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma declined intervention petition proceedings.

Writ Court Is Not the Panacea for All Ills: Supreme Court Dismisses Savukku Shankar’s Plea to Unseal Office

Today, on 20th January, The Supreme Court dismissed YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s plea seeking unsealing of his Chennai office and return of seized devices in an assault and extortion case. Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma advised approaching the judicial magistrate.

Madras High Court Tells Savukku Shankar to ‘Approach Magistrate for Relief’, Declines Plea to De-Freezing Bank Account

The Madras High Court declined to hear YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s plea to defreeze bank accounts and return seized devices, directing him to instead seek relief before the jurisdictional magistrate after his arrest over alleged assault and ₹2-lakh extortion.

Supreme Court Stays PMLA Probe in TASMAC Case: “ED Crossing All Limits, Acting Unconstitutionally”

Today, On 22nd May, The Supreme Court has stayed the ED’s PMLA probe into the Rs.1,000 crore TASMAC case, stating the agency is “violating the Constitution” and “crossing all limits,” while hearing Tamil Nadu’s challenge to the Madras High Court order.

[Lawyers Ads Controversy] Digital Platform Sulekha Moves Supreme Court Against Madras High Court Order 

The Madras High Court mandated the Bar Council of India (BCI) to establish guidelines against lawyer advertising. In response, Sulekha challenged the directive in the Supreme Court, which has combined it with JustDial’s similar plea. The Court is evaluating compliance with the Advocates Act and BCI regulations amid concerns about online lawyer services.