The Madras High Court directed police to seize a book carrying offensive remarks and objectionable depictions against a sitting judge. Planned for a city book fair on January 8, it allegedly targeted Justice G. R. Swaminathan, the petitioner said.
In a letter to the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, Senior Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara revealed significant obstacles in filing writ petitions under Article 226, stating they’ve never been this severe in his four-decade career. He suggested reforms for better listings and improved virtual court access, urging immediate action for justice accessibility.
The Supreme Court has temporarily stayed a Madras High Court ruling that reopened a disproportionate wealth case against former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O Panneerselvam and his family. The High Court had revived the case citing legal concerns over earlier proceedings, but the Supreme Court’s stay halts the trial while considering Panneerselvam’s challenge, impacting Tamil Nadu’s political landscape.
The Madras High Court ruled that only Hindus can be appointed to roles in self-financing colleges funded by temple resources, dismissing a petition from a Muslim candidate. Justice Singh clarified that such institutions don’t qualify as “State” under the Constitution, allowing for religious-based hiring. The ruling emphasizes the religious identity of these institutions and their employment criteria.
The Madras High Court emphasized the need for unbiased investigations into money laundering cases, asserting that such offenses negatively impact the economy and burden the common man. In a ruling that set aside a closure report against lottery baron S. Martin, the court stressed the importance of fair investigations to uphold justice and protect citizens’ interests under the PMLA.
The Madras High Court dismissed YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s petition seeking criminal contempt proceedings against DMK leader RS Bharathi. The court emphasized the importance of **transparency** in the judiciary, stating that **“judges can’t shy away from criticism.”** Bharathi’s comments were deemed protected under citizens’ freedom of speech, leading to the dismissal.
The Madras High Court has ordered the Tamil Nadu HR&CE Department to take action against a temple trustee and staff who filmed a comical Instagram reel inside the Devi Karumari Amman Temple. Justice M Dhandapani criticized the mockery, emphasizing that temples should be treated with respect and devotion.
Bar associations in Tamil Nadu are protesting Justice R Subramanian’s derogatory remarks towards Senior Advocate P Wilson, urging action for respectful communication in courts. They demand a committee to address courtroom conduct and investigate social media leaks. This incident underscores the need for reforms to ensure dignity in judicial interactions.
Today, On 2nd September, The Supreme Court initiated a suo moto case regarding delayed compensation distribution by tribunals. Five High Courts have been asked to respond. A retired Gujarat judge brought attention to Rs. 2,000 crores in unpaid compensation. Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora is appointed as Amicus Curiae, and the Supreme Court seeks responses to address the issue.
