News Report Targeting Judge | MP High Court Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Cost on Editor

The Madhya Pradesh High Court found Suman Singh Sikarwar, editor of Dainik Chambal Vani, guilty of contempt of court for publishing a news report against a judge. A fine of Rs 1 lakh and additional costs were imposed. The court cautioned Sikarwar to be more careful in the future to avoid such situations.

MP HC Refuses to Recognise High Court Advocates Bar Association

The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition by the High Court Advocates Bar Association for separate recognition. The court stressed that existing bar associations adequately address the objectives and welfare schemes outlined in relevant legislation. It emphasized the need for substantive justifications when seeking separate recognition, particularly when current frameworks suffice.

Supreme Court: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Assessment of Juvenile in Heinous Offences

The Supreme Court clarified that the three-month timeline for assessing juveniles accused of serious crimes is not mandatory but advisory. The decision allows for extensions with a reasoned order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, emphasizing the importance of a preliminary assessment involving experienced professionals. The ruling aims to balance accountability and fair treatment for juvenile offenders.

“Kareena Kapoor Khan’s Pregnancy Bible” | Madhya Pradesh HC Issues Notice to Kareena Kapoor Khan Over Book Title

On 9th May, Madhya Pradesh High Court issues notice to Kareena Kapoor Khan over ‘Bible’ use in book title, following petition alleging offense to Christian sentiments.

Gynaecologist Left Sponge in Patient’s Stomach | HC Quashes Case

The Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed a criminal case against a doctor accused of leaving a sponge inside the stomach of a woman during her child birth operation in 2016.

Husband’s Unnatural Sex With Wife Not Amount To Rape: Madhya Pradesh HC

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that engaging in unnatural sex with one’s spouse does not constitute rape under Indian law, as marital rape is not recognized. The decision has sparked debates on marital rape and the importance of consent in matrimonial relationships, highlighting the need for legal reforms to address gaps in existing laws and ensure comprehensive protection against sexual violence within marriage.

SC’s Criticism Towards MP Govt’s ‘High-Handed’ Approach | Orders for Immediate Appointment of Women

Today, On 3rd May, The Supreme Court criticized the Madhya Pradesh government and directed the immediate appointment of a woman to a teaching position. The woman had passed the relevant examination in 2008 but had not been formally appointed. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 10 lakh. The decision emphasizes the importance of respecting legal procedures and ensuring gender representation in appointments.

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused| ‘Honey Trap’ Case

Today, 2nd May, The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to a hotel manager involved in a ‘Honey Trap’ case involving blackmail through romantic relationships. The decision offers temporary relief amid ongoing investigations. The Court also issued a notice to the Madhya Pradesh Police. The case highlights complex legal issues around entrapment, consent, and defendant rights.

Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Directive on Lawyer’s ‘Mental Well-being’

The Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized lawyers’ mental well-being, acknowledging the unique stresses they face. Following a case involving a lawyer’s inappropriate conduct, the court highlighted the importance of mental health support for legal professionals. This reflects a broader societal shift towards prioritizing mental well-being in professional settings and seeks to destigmatize mental health issues in the legal field.

Supreme Court: Balancing Qualification and Experience| MP Judicial Service

Today,26th April, The Supreme Court upheld the eligibility criteria for Madhya Pradesh judicial service, requiring 3 years of legal practice or 70% in a law degree, emphasizing the need for qualified candidates. The decision dismisses objections and reinforces the requirement’s importance for the state’s judiciary, ensuring competent candidates and elevating judicial standards.