Supreme Court: “NIA Court Can Continue Trial Against Baramulla MP Engineer Rashid Under UAPA”S

The Supreme Court clarified that the NIA court in Delhi can continue hearing the case of Engineer Rashid. He was arrested in 2019 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in a terror funding case. Rashid remains in jail as an accused in the matter. The ruling affirms the jurisdiction of the NIA court over the proceedings.

Women’s Reservation Bill | ‘No Violation of Fundamental Rights, Including Article 14’: Supreme Court Dismisses PILs Challenging The Bill

Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court dismissed PILs challenging the Women’s Reservation Bill, stating there was no violation of fundamental rights, including Article 14. The petitions questioned the Bill’s constitutional validity and its deferment due to the delimitation clause. The Court clarified that Article 32 jurisdiction cannot be invoked in this case. This decision reaffirms the legislative process for implementing women’s political representation in India.

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal: “Over 36,000 Supreme Court Judgments Translated into Hindi, 42,000+ in Regional Languages Using AI”

Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal shared that more than 78,000 Supreme Court judgments have been translated into Hindi and regional languages using AI. He explained how AI is helping in areas like translation, better administration, natural language processing (NLP), automated case filing, scheduling, case details systems, and chatting with litigants through chatbots.

FARMERS PROTEST|| “We Did Not Expect Such Insensitivity”: Farmers Refuse to Meet Supreme Court Appointed Committee, Demand Discussion with Centre

Farmers refused to meet a Supreme Court-appointed committee, wanting direct talks with the central government instead. They criticize the committee’s insensitivity towards their concerns amid ongoing protests. Jagjit Singh Dallewal highlighted ongoing issues, including police brutality against farmers and his hunger strike, emphasizing the need for immediate government dialogue.

BREAKING | One Nation One Election: Division Voting In Lok Sabha-269 MPs In Favour & 198 Against

The “One Nation, One Election” Bill formally introduced Today (Dec 17) in the Lok Sabha following a division vote. The results of the vote showcased significant interest and division among lawmakers, with 269 Members of Parliament (MPs) voting in favor and 198 MPs voting against the motion. Union Law Minister Arjun Meghwal took charge of presenting the Bill, marking an essential milestone in the country’s political reforms.

BREAKING | Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal In Lok Sabha: “One Nation, One Election Bill Aligned With Ease Of Elections”

A proposal to hold simultaneous federal and state elections – the contentious ‘one nation, one election’ proposal – is a long-pending piece of electoral reform and will not damage or tamper with the Constitution, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal told the Lok Sabha Today (Dec 17).

BREAKING | One Nation, One Election Bill Tabled By Law Minister In Lok Sabha, Congress Says Withdraw Immediately

Today, On 17th December, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal introduced the “One Nation, One Election” bill in the Lok Sabha, facing strong opposition, particularly from Congress. This proposal aims to synchronize elections nationwide, but critics fear it could undermine democracy and federalism. The ongoing parliamentary session is likely to intensify political confrontations.

BREAKING | One Nation, One Election Bills To Be Introduced In Lok Sabha Today (Dec 17)

The government is set to introduce the ‘One Nation, One Election’ bills in the Lok Sabha Today-December 17, aiming to synchronize Lok Sabha, state assembly, urban body, and panchayat elections. The move seeks to reduce election costs, streamline governance, and minimize administrative disruptions. These bills are based on recommendations by a high-level committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind.

“Savarkar said There’s Nothing Indian about Constitution”: Rahul Gandhi Draws ‘Constitution vs Manusmriti’ Parallel In Parliament

Rahul Gandhi’s parliamentary speech critiqued the BJP government by contrasting the Indian Constitution with the Manusmriti, referencing Hindutva figure Savarkar. He accused the ruling party of dishonoring Savarkar’s legacy while defending constitutional values. His remarks ignited controversy over Savarkar’s historical role, with strong reactions from both Congress and BJP supporters.