Right to Life and Liberty Under Article 21 Must Be Safeguarded Even If Marriage Legality Is Disputed: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reaffirmed that the right to life and liberty under Article 21 must be protected at all times, making it clear that such fundamental rights cannot be denied or diluted even when disputes arise regarding the legality of a marriage.

Live-In Relationships ‘Web of Modernity and Culture’: Madras High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail, Invokes Section 69 BNS

The Madras High Court refused anticipatory bail to a man accused of sexual relations on a false promise of marriage, observing that women in live-in relationships are trapped in a “web of modernity and culture” and directing the invocation of Section 69 of the BNS.

Marital Cruelty Law Applies to Live-In Relationships; ‘Husband’ Under 498A Includes Partners With Marital Attributes: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court ruled that the law against marital cruelty also applies to live-in relationships. It clarified that the term ‘husband’ under Section 498A of the IPC includes partners in relationships with marital traits.

Allahabad High Court: “Live-In Relationship Goes Against Women’s Interest”

The Allahabad High Court observed that live-in relationships harm women more, as men can easily remarry after breakups. The Court stated, “Live-in relationship goes against the interest of the women…” while granting bail in a rape case.

Live-in Relationships Not Fully Accepted in Indian Society, UCC Aims to Safeguard Rights: Uttarakhand High Court

Uttarakhand: Today, 27th Feb, The Uttarakhand High Court discussed the increasing acceptance of live-in relationships while also noting that they might not be fully accepted in Indian society. The Court observed that the new Uniform Civil Code (UCC) law seeks to adjust to these changes while safeguarding the rights of women and children born from such relationships.

UCC| Uttarakhand High Court Hears Petition Against Mandatory Registration of Live-In Relationships

Nainital, February 21: The Uttarakhand High Court to hear petition that challenges the rule requiring mandatory registration of live-in relationships under the recently implemented Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the state. A division bench consisting of Chief Justice Guhanathan Narendar and Justice Ashish Naithani conducted the hearing on Friday.

Uttarakhand High Court Seeks Government Response on UCC Petitions, Allows Affected Individuals to Approach Court

Uttarakhand: The Uttarakhand High Court sought a response from the state government within six weeks regarding multiple petitions challenging the recently implemented Uniform Civil Code (UCC). Chief Justice G Narender, while hearing one such petition on Friday, observed that anyone facing action under the UCC in the meantime could approach the court for relief.

UCC| Uttarakhand Chief Justice Questions Live-in Relationships: ‘What if a Child is Born?’

Uttarakhand: Observing that a person’s self-respect should not be sacrificed in the name of privacy, especially when the person is a child born in a live-in relationship, the Uttarakhand High Court on Wednesday questioned what was wrong with regulating such relationships.

PIL In HC Challenges Uttarakhand UCC: ‘Some Provisions Infringe on Privacy & Discriminate Against Minorities’

A PIL in the Uttarakhand High Court challenges the State’s Uniform Civil Code (UCC). The petitioner acknowledges that the UCC has eliminated many discriminatory practices. However, they argue that certain provisions impose unreasonable restrictions. The court will examine the validity of these concerns.

Live-In Relationships || ‘High Time to Find Solutions to Save Society’s Moral Values’: Allahabad High Court

The High Court emphasized the need to address the societal implications of live-in relationships, stating, “It is high time we consider and establish a framework to uphold the moral values of society.” The court highlighted growing concerns over the impact of such relationships on traditional norms. It called for a collective effort to find solutions that balance individual freedoms with cultural ethics.