The Supreme Court ruled that appeals under Section 21 of the NIA Act cannot be dismissed solely for being filed after the 90-day limit. The court is reviewing if the limitation is mandatory or directory, as contrasting rulings from Bombay and Madras High Courts create uncertainty. The final decision may significantly impact future cases.
In a 47-page judgment, the court determined that the suit was filed within the limitation period and that only the appellant husband had the right to file it. The high court noted that the family court had erred in dismissing the case. Allahabad: In allowing an appeal against a family court decision, the Allahabad High […]
![[Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute] Temple is a Protected Monument Under 1958 Act, Hindu Side Tells HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-35.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
On 2nd May, The ongoing Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute involves the Hindu side presenting arguments to recognize the temple as a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. The Allahabad High Court is addressing concerns regarding the suit’s maintainability, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7 for the Muslim side’s arguments.
The Hindu side asserts that the deity was not involved in the compromise or court decree in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute at the Allahabad High Court. They argue against the applicability of the Waqf Act and emphasize the property’s historical and religious significance. The legal battle continues.