In the digital age, the question of whether citizens can legally record police officers during encounters has become increasingly relevant and important.
In 2024, the Delhi High Court witnessed numerous high-profile cases, particularly involving AAP leaders like Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, linked to the excise policy corruption scandal. Legal battles included arrests, bail pleas, and administrative challenges, with setbacks for AAP and opposition leaders alike. The court also addressed broader issues such as healthcare, infrastructure, student politics, and public interest litigations, while setting the stage for significant hearings in 2025 on matters like personal liberty and political accountability.
The Delhi High Court ruled that property seized under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act must be returned within 365 days if no prosecution complaint is filed. This reinforces the balance between law enforcement and individual rights. The decision reflects a cautious approach towards the exercise of power by enforcement agencies, emphasizing respect for the rule of law.
The Centre emphasized to the Supreme Court the need for national reflection in institutions of national significance like Aligarh Muslim University. Solicitor General highlighted the absence of reservation and the institution’s importance. The case revolves around AMU’s minority status, with ongoing deliberation by a seven-judge constitution bench. The hearing continues on Wednesday.
More than 250 advocates have requested an apology from Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta High Court following insults directed at the Advocate General during a court session. The Supreme Court has intervened, transferring the case involving a caste certificate scam to itself. This highlights concerns about judicial conduct and the need for maintaining dignity and respect in the judicial process.
The Kerala government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court, stating it had no plans to conduct a caste survey and emphasized the responsibility of the Central government in conducting such surveys. The government refuted allegations of intentional disobedience and highlighted the challenges in utilizing socio-economic data for policymaking. This case has significant implications for the identification and support of backward classes in Kerala.