• Mon. Feb 9th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: legal proceedings

    Bihar Judge Death Mystery: Nawada District & Sessions Judge Shilpi Soni Raj Found Dead at Government Residence
    Bihar Judge Death Mystery: Nawada District & Sessions Judge Shilpi Soni Raj Found Dead at Government Residence
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Bihar Judge Death Mystery: Nawada District & Sessions Court Shilpi Soni Raj Found Dead at Government Residence

    Nawada District and Sessions Judge Shilpi Soni Raj was found dead at her government residence in Bihar, as Principal District and Sessions Judge Shilpee Soniraj tragically passed away under mysterious circumstances, prompting an official investigation today.

    author
    Custodians Of Law Accused of Breaching It: Court Summons 2 Cops for Beating Muslim Man to Death, Forcing Him to Sing National Anthem
    Custodians Of Law Accused of Breaching It: Court Summons 2 Cops for Beating Muslim Man to Death, Forcing Him to Sing National Anthem
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    Custodians Of Law Accused of Breaching It: Court Summons 2 Cops for Beating Muslim Man to Death, Forcing Him to Sing National Anthem

    A Delhi court has summoned two police officers over the death of a 23-year-old man beaten with lathis during the 2020 riots. The court said the officials, entrusted as custodians of the law, appeared driven by bigoted mindsets.

    author
    What Do We Do With This Shaadi.com?: Supreme Court Raises Concern In Matrimonial Dispute Case
    What Do We Do With This Shaadi.com?: Supreme Court Raises Concern In Matrimonial Dispute Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    What Do We Do With This Shaadi.com?: Supreme Court Raises Concern In Matrimonial Dispute Case

    The Supreme Court expressed concern over online platform Shaadi.com after learning that mediation attempts had repeatedly failed between the estranged couple. Justice JB Pardiwala remarked, “Shaadi.com? You met on Shaadi.com?” after hearing husband had not seen his wife.

    author
    2020 Delhi Riots: Court Acquits Man Accused of Rioting & Arson
    2020 Delhi Riots: Court Acquits Man Accused of Rioting & Arson
    Other CourtsLatest news

    2020 Delhi Riots: Court Acquits Man Accused of Rioting & Arson

    A court acquitted a man accused of rioting and arson during the 2020 Delhi riots after finding major inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case. It held that relying on the testimony of the lone identifying witness would be unreliable.

    author
    Engineer Rashid Allowed to Attend Parliament Session from Jan 28; Delhi Court Permits Kashmir MP
    Engineer Rashid Allowed to Attend Parliament Session from Jan 28; Delhi Court Permits Kashmir MP
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    Engineer Rashid Allowed to Attend Parliament Session from Jan 28; Delhi Court Permits Kashmir MP

    A Delhi court granted Baramulla MP Engineer Rashid permission to attend the Parliament budget session beginning January 28, his counsel confirmed. The approval is subject to conditions and comes as his appeal remains pending before Delhi High Court.

    author
    Long Ties, Child Birth Are Signs of Relationship in the Nature of Marriage: Bombay High Court Refuses to Quash DV Case Against Man
    Long Ties, Child Birth Are Signs of Relationship in the Nature of Marriage: Bombay High Court Refuses to Quash DV Case Against Man
    High CourtHeadlines

    Long Ties, Child Birth Are Signs of Relationship in the Nature of Marriage: Bombay High Court Refuses to Quash DV Case Against Man

    The Bombay High Court held that a long-term intimate partnership marked by repeated cohabitation and child birth amounts to a relationship in the nature of marriage under the DV Act. It refused to quash the case against him.

    author
    A Lengthy Period Without Further Offences Can Justify Sentence Reduction: Supreme Court
    A Lengthy Period Without Further Offences Can Justify Sentence Reduction: Supreme Court
    Supreme Court

    A Lengthy Period Without Further Offences Can Justify Sentence Reduction: Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court said that a long offence-free period can justify reducing sentences in minor, non-violent cases. In the 1995 house-breaking matter, the three-month sentence was reduced to the 15 days already undergone.

    author
    Blissfully Ignorant, It's the Litigant Who Suffers: Delhi High Court Slams Lawyers for Seeking Adjournments
    Blissfully Ignorant, It's the Litigant Who Suffers: Delhi High Court Slams Lawyers for Seeking Adjournments
    HeadlinesHigh Court

    Blissfully Ignorant, It’s the Litigant Who Suffers: Delhi High Court Slams Lawyers for Seeking Adjournments

    The Delhi High Court expressed sharp disapproval over lawyers repeatedly seeking adjournments, stressing that such delays unfairly burden litigants. “Blissfully ignorant, it’s the litigant who suffers,” the Court remarked while criticising advocates for disrupting the judicial process.

    author
    Frivolous Attempt to Get Publicity: Supreme Court Rejects Lawyer’s Plea Against Rs.5 Lakh Penalty
    Frivolous Attempt to Get Publicity: Supreme Court Rejects Lawyer’s Plea Against Rs.5 Lakh Penalty
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Frivolous Attempt to Get Publicity: Supreme Court Rejects Lawyer’s Plea Against Rs.5 Lakh Penalty

    Today, On 19th January, The Supreme Court rejected a plea challenging a Rs five lakh penalty imposed on a Lucknow lawyer. He claimed the court had announced only a Rs 25,000 fine, but was later penalized for filing a “frivolous” PIL case.

    author
    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train
    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train
    HeadlinesSupreme Court

    Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Slams MP Judge Over Alleged Urination in Train

    Today, On 12th January, The Supreme Court expressed deep dismay over the alleged misconduct of a Madhya Pradesh civil judge during a train journey, including urinating in the compartment. “Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer,” the Court said, condemning the act.

    author