The Supreme Court of India issued a landmark ruling on November 5, determining that not all private property is a community resource. This decision prompted dissent from Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Sudhanshu Dhulia, who criticized the majority’s characterization of prior judicial doctrines, highlighting the importance of dissenting opinions in shaping legal interpretations and promoting transparency.
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that the right to live with dignity includes a husband’s duty to his family, granting interim bail to a man to care for his critically ill wife. The court emphasized that fulfilling familial responsibilities is essential to personal dignity, citing Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
![[Inhumane Prison Conditions] ‘Last Person Matters Most’: SC On Freeing Eligible Female Undertrial Prisoners](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 26th October, the Supreme Court ruled that murder charges do not automatically justify bail denial, emphasizing individual rights and the presumption of innocence. While granting bail to an accused, the Court criticized rigid bail practices and highlighted the need for nuanced case-specific evaluations in pre-trial detention, reinforcing fairness in the justice system.
Yesterday, On 25th October, the Supreme Court criticized the Patna High Court for issuing post-dated bail orders that would take effect only after five months. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for timely justice and remanded the cases for reconsideration. This ruling reflects a broader push for transparency in legal proceedings.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna is set to become the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, succeeding CJI D.Y. Chandrachud. Known for pivotal rulings on Article 370 and electoral bonds, Khanna’s appointment marks a significant transition in the Supreme Court’s leadership, reinforcing accountability and transparency in India’s judicial system.
Today, On 19th October, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the Supreme Court’s role as a people’s court, emphasizing judicial independence and the need to balance with legislative and executive branches. He cautioned against evaluating the court based on outcomes, advocating for access to justice and advancing technology to enhance transparency in judicial processes.
![[Gauri Lankesh Murder Case] Apex Court Dismisses Plea to Cancel Bail to Accused](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-22T153024.842.png?resize=412%2C232&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today rejected a plea to cancel bail for Mohan Nayak N, an accused in the Gauri Lankesh murder case. The bench upheld the High Court’s decision, emphasizing the need for expedited proceedings and stating that bail cancellation could be pursued if conditions were violated. The accused had been in custody since July 18, 2018.
Today (16th May): The Supreme Court scrutinized the Enforcement Directorate’s handling of a witness statement in Arvind Kejriwal’s case, highlighting the need for corroboration and questioning the veracity of other statements. The court emphasized the importance of noting disbelief in witness statements and discussed the legality of arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The proceedings will continue.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that saying “go hang yourself” does not automatically amount to abetment of suicide under the Indian Penal Code. Complexities of the human mind and varied reasons for suicide were highlighted. The court quashed a case against a man accused of abetment, emphasizing the difficulty in understanding motives behind suicide.