The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) have approached the Supreme Court with a request. They seek a direction to ensure that the names of all lawyers present and appearing in a case are officially recorded. This move aims to give due recognition to all advocates contributing to cases. The matter is now before the top court for consideration.
The Calcutta High Court expressed disapproval of trial courts offering unwanted advice in divorce proceedings. It emphasized that only the couple involved can decide on reconciliation. This follows a case where a trial court suggested a couple reunite for their child’s sake, which the High Court deemed inappropriate and beyond the court’s jurisdiction.
An Advocate-on-Record (AoR) is a specialized lawyer authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court of India, handling case filings, drafting petitions, and ensuring compliance with court procedures. To qualify, AoRs must pass a specialized exam after training. Their role is crucial for effective legal representation and maintaining court integrity.
The Supreme Court reprimanded lawyers for disruptive behavior during a hearing involving Advocate Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal, emphasizing the necessity of professional conduct in live-streamed sessions. Justice Surya Kant warned of serious consequences, including license suspension, for continued misconduct, highlighting the importance of courtroom decorum and accountability.
Today, On 6th December, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition against lawyers affiliated with political parties participating in Bar Council elections, asserting that political beliefs do not disqualify their involvement. The Court emphasized the independence of bar associations and allowed individuals to hold office despite political ideologies, highlighting the need for balancing responsibilities and beliefs.
Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar, born on August 14, 1963, in Hyderabad, assumed office on February 6, 2023, and will retire on August 13, 2028. He completed his education in Commerce and Law, began his career in his father’s law office, and has held significant positions, including Chief Justice of the Manipur High Court.
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that a lawyer cannot be held criminally liable for financial losses to a bank without evidence of intent to defraud. Charges against an SBI lawyer were quashed as there was no proof of collusion or active participation in a loan fraud scheme, emphasizing the necessity of malicious intent in fraud cases.
The Bombay High Court criticized a trial court’s death sentence in a multi-murder case, finding its reasoning, which cited the Mahabharata, “strange” and unwarranted. The High Court emphasized the need for individualized assessments in trials, ultimately commuting the death penalty to life imprisonment for some convicts while acquitting one due to lack of evidence.
![[Ghaziabad District Court Disruptions] "Need a Secure & Supportive Environment to Fulfill Duties Without Fear": Delhi Judicial Service Association Urges CJI to Ensure Judges' Safety & Judicial Dignity](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi Judicial Service Association (DJSA) condemned recent violent attacks by lawyers on a District Judge in Ghaziabad, urging the Chief Justice of India to ensure judicial safety and independence. They emphasized the need for a respectful environment, warning that such behavior undermines public trust in the legal system and the principles of justice.
Yesterday, On 26th October, the Supreme Court stayed the Allahabad High Court’s Rs.1 lakh fine on advocate Mehmood Pracha, accused of “forum shopping” and inappropriate attire while self-representing. This stay offers temporary relief as the Supreme Court reviews the High Court’s decision, questioning the penalty’s validity and the remarks against Pracha.