The Allahabad High Court held that calling a husband “impotent” does not constitute defamation when supported by medical evidence, setting aside a summoning order after observing the wife acted in good faith and without malice, while criticising the trial court for inadequate factual assessment.
The Supreme Court of India refused to club 53 FIRs across seven states in a ₹49-crore investment scam case, questioning “What will happen to the rights of the victims,” while rejecting pleas filed by accused Upendra Nath Mishra and Kali Prasad Mishra.
The Calcutta High Court restrained West Bengal Police from taking coercive action against Abhishek Banerjee till July 31 over remarks allegedly targeting Amit Shah, while directing Banerjee to cooperate with the investigation and seek permission before travelling abroad.
The Madras High Court sought a response from the Election Commission of India on allegations that Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam used children during the 2026 Tamil Nadu election campaign, while questioning whether a political party itself could face disqualification for corrupt practices.
The Calcutta High Court restrained West Bengal Police from taking coercive action against Paresh Ram Das in six criminal cases, directing investigations to continue lawfully while granting interim protection till June 30, 2026, subject to cooperation with investigators.
The Allahabad High Court held that police cannot conduct further investigation without prior court permission and clarified that taking cognizance twice in the same criminal case after commencement of trial proceedings is legally impermissible, while deciding a plea filed by Syed Mohammad Hamza.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court awarded Rs 10 lakh compensation to a businessman jailed for 57 days after airport screening equipment allegedly misidentified aamchur powder and garam masala as narcotic substances, highlighting serious deficiencies in forensic infrastructure and airport narcotics detection mechanisms.
A petition before the Supreme Court of India sought a court-monitored Central Bureau of Investigation probe into alleged corruption and horse-trading during Vijay’s Tamil Nadu Assembly trust vote, with petitioner K K Ramesh claiming the floor test violated democratic principles.
The Supreme Court of India made prima facie observations favouring accused Tasleem Ahmed and Khalid Saifi while hearing bail pleas in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case under the UAPA before adjourning further consideration.
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi government to frame a policy within four months for speedy refund of court fees after dispute settlements, observing that the absence of a codified mechanism causes unnecessary hardship and procedural delays for litigants seeking refunds under the Court Fees Act.
