Today, On 14th Aug, Actor Darshan and Pavithra Gowda were arrested after the Supreme Court cancelled their bail in a high-profile murder case. The court emphasized, “Popularity Not a Shield,” underlining that fame does not exempt anyone from legal accountability.
Today, On 24th July, Supreme Court reserved its verdict in the case and criticised the Karnataka High Court for granting bail to actor Darshan, calling it a “perverse exercise of power” in such a serious offence.
Today, On 24th July, Supreme Court reserved its verdict in the case and criticised the Karnataka High Court for granting bail to actor Darshan, calling it a “perverse exercise of power” in such a serious offence.
In August last year, the shocking rape and murder of a junior doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata drew statewide attention. However, months before this tragic incident, the hospital’s former principal, Dr. Sandip Ghosh, was already under investigation by the West Bengal Human Rights Commission (WBHRC).
Today, On 24th January, The Supreme Court issued a notice to Darshan in response to Karnataka’s appeal challenging his bail in the Renukawsmy murder case. The Karnataka High Court had granted regular bail to Darshan, Pavithra, and five other accused on December 13, 2024. The state government has questioned the decision, seeking its reversal. The case will now be reviewed by the apex court for further consideration.
Dr. Mohankumar, accused of money laundering related to securing a medical seat for a public servant’s daughter, had his discharge application rejected by the Karnataka High Court. The court emphasized that evidence collected warranted proceeding with the trial, finding unexplained cash deposits raised significant suspicions. The case will continue.
In Karnataka, three individuals were granted bail by the Bengaluru Trial Court for allegedly chanting pro-Pakistan slogans at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly. They must each post a Rs 1 lakh bond and provide two sureties, and comply with travel restrictions and court attendance. The defense argues that their arrest lacked procedural validity. The Court’s decision aligns with guidelines to prevent unnecessary arrests.
