The Supreme Court ruled that unauthorised constructions must be demolished, emphasising that the law should not protect rule-breakers. Allowing such actions would create a habit of ignoring rules and escaping responsibility.
The Supreme Court ruled that cleaning, washing, and dry cleaning of clothes are considered ‘manufacturing’ under the Factories Act. The Court explained that something does not need to change completely or become a new product to be called a manufacturing process. This decision gives a wider meaning to what activities are included under the Act. It may also affect labor rules and workplace laws in the service industry.
Madras: The Madras High Court has asked the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) to submit an urgent report regarding a petition seeking to stop permission for Maha Shivaratri celebrations at the Isha Foundation. Thousands of devotees are expected to visit the spiritual center throughout the night on February 26, raising concerns over environmental violations.
New Delhi, 17th February 2025: The National Commission for Women (NCW) has issued a new hearing date after multiple individuals failed to appear in response to a summons regarding derogatory and obscene remarks made on the YouTube program ‘India’s Got Latent’.
The Orissa High Court directed that all police stations and out-posts must be fully equipped with CCTV cameras by March 31. Additionally, the court emphasized the strict acceptance to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the arrest of armed forces personnel by the police. These measures aim to enhance accountability and ensure proper protocol in law enforcement practices.
The Competition Commission of India fined Meta Rs. 213.14 crore for abusing its market dominance related to WhatsApp’s 2021 privacy policy, which forced users to accept new data-sharing terms. The CCI issued cease-and-desist orders, requiring changes to data handling practices, including opt-out options and transparency in data sharing.
NEW DELHI: Today (10th April): The Supreme Court has rejected Patanjali’s unconditional apology for misleading advertisements, criticizing the company for deliberate disobedience. Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah emphasized that leniency would not be shown. Patanjali founders acknowledged the breach, but the court disapproved, asserting the seriousness of the matter. The case pertains to false advertisements for Patanjali’s medicinal products.
The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of individuals arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), emphasizing the need for the Enforcement Directorate to adhere to constitutional norms. The court upheld the requirement for written grounds of arrest to be provided, underscoring the importance of transparency and adherence to legal procedures.
