On Tuesday(18th June),The Bombay High Court criticized the Maharashtra government for misinterpreting its order allowing animal slaughter at Vishalgad Fort during Bakri Eid and Urs, expressing concern that this interpretation could lead to disharmony and unrest. The court emphasized that its permission applied to all devotees and urged the authorities to adhere to the directive in both letter and spirit.
Today(on 11th June),Madras High Court, led by Justice Anita Sumanth, declines mediation for the dispute between ex-DGP Rajesh Das and IAS officer Beela Venkatesan, signaling a pivotal moment in their legal battle. The decision underscores the court’s stance against mediation, emphasizing the complexity of their conflict.
The ECI submitted an affidavit on 22nd May, to the Supreme Court, arguing against the disclosure of Form 17C data, stating it could confuse voters. The ECI criticized ADR for making false allegations and seeking unfounded entitlements. A potential legal battle looms as the Supreme Court asks ECI to respond to ADR’s application, raising transparency concerns.
![[Sandeshkhali Row] No Coercive Action Against BJP's Basirhat Candidate Rekha Patra: Cal HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-105.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Calcutta High Court granted temporary relief to BJP’s Basirhat candidate Rekha Patra, prohibiting coercive action until June 14 in a suo motu case related to protests in Sandeshkhali. The area has seen violence linked to socio-political tensions. Patra led demonstrations against crimes targeting women, and the High Court’s decision impacts the approaching Lok Sabha elections.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision to uphold the summons in a criminal defamation case will be heard by the Supreme Court. The case involves a retweet of an allegedly defamatory video. Kejriwal admitted to making a mistake, and the Supreme Court asked if he wished to apologize. The matter highlights the gravity of the issue, as public figures’ social media actions carry weight with the public.
The Managing Director of Patanjali Ayurveda, Acharya Balkrishna, filed a plea against the President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), Dr. RV Asokan, for disparaging remarks about the Supreme Court. This arises from the Court’s criticism of IMA’s unethical practices. Simultaneously, the Supreme Court is hearing a petition by IMA against Patanjali Ayurveda for misleading advertisements.
In July, the Supreme Court will address challenges to the 28% Goods and Services Tax (GST) on online gaming companies. Several petitions contest the tax’s validity and its impact on the industry. The court will hear concerns raised by Baazi Networks Private Limited and other online gaming companies and address pending petitions. The tax notices were issued retrospectively, alleging GST evasion of Rs 1.12 lakh crore.
On Wednesday (24th April): Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was contested in the Supreme Court, with the agency citing his non-cooperation during the investigation. The ED maintains that Kejriwal’s behaviour warranted his arrest, while the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) accuses the ED of falsehoods and serving the interests of the BJP. Kejriwal is in judicial custody at Tihar jail.
Today(on 24th April), Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal granted two-week extension for rejoinder in the Delhi excise policy case against the ED. The court allowed time for filing legal documents and arguments due to Kejriwal’s arrest and contested summons. The case resumes on May 14. Legal dispute centers on alleged financial mismanagement linked to the Delhi liquor policy.
The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of Emami, prohibiting HUL from using the ‘Glow & Handsome’ trademark for men’s care products. This decision highlights the significance of protecting intellectual property rights in the beauty industry. Amid intense competition in the beauty sector, the ruling sets a precedent for similar trademark disputes, impacting future legal battles.
