The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the removal of a civil judge for poor performance, not misconduct. Allegations like making lawyers do sit-ups were not the reason for his dismissal.
The clash between Kerala High Court lawyers and judges took a sharp turn as the Advocates’ Association sent a strong message to the judiciary. In a letter to Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, they urged judges to “not meddle with the affairs of the association,” highlighting rising tensions and discontent.
Today, On 7th April, During a heated exchange in court, the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court told a Senior Advocate that he did not deserve the title after the lawyer raised his voice. The confrontation occurred during proceedings, drawing sharp remarks from the bench. Taking serious note of the conduct, the Court decided to escalate the matter. It ordered the lawyer’s name to be placed before the Full Court for reconsideration of his Senior Advocate status.
Today, On 19th March, The Supreme Court ruled that only the arguing counsel, the advocate-on-record (AoR), and one assisting counsel can have their names officially recorded. Additionally, the Court emphasized that a Senior Counsel cannot appear without an advocate-on-record. This decision aims to maintain procedural discipline in court proceedings. The ruling clarifies the hierarchy and roles of legal representatives before the apex court.
The Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association decided to demand the transfer of Justice A Badharudeen over certain concerns. Sources indicate that the association is also moving to suspend Senior Advocate Poonthottam. The decision ignited discussions within the legal community. Further developments on the matter are awaited.