Today, On 25th November, Supreme Court sharply questioned a lawyer over repeated adjournment requests, asking, “Who is accountable for the 90,000 pending cases in this court?” The Bench warned that constant delays only harm litigants and reflect a lack of preparation.
Today, On 6th September, The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCOARA) condemned an advocate’s act against the Chief Justice of India, calling it an “unwarranted and intemperate gesture.” SCOARA urged the Supreme Court to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings, affirming full support for the judiciary.
![[Ghaziabad District Court Disruptions] "Need a Secure & Supportive Environment to Fulfill Duties Without Fear": Delhi Judicial Service Association Urges CJI to Ensure Judges' Safety & Judicial Dignity](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi Judicial Service Association (DJSA) condemned recent violent attacks by lawyers on a District Judge in Ghaziabad, urging the Chief Justice of India to ensure judicial safety and independence. They emphasized the need for a respectful environment, warning that such behavior undermines public trust in the legal system and the principles of justice.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court criticized a lawyer for attempting to secure a favorable judgment by pressuring the court with concerns about losing his legal fees. The court emphasized that an advocate’s profession is not a business and should not focus on fee recovery. The petition was ultimately dismissed, highlighting the professional duty of lawyers to prioritize their clients’ cases over financial interests.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashes the FIR against lawyer Pritpaljit Singh Sangha over an alleged offensive WhatsApp message against Hindu deities, following a compromise between the parties. The court directs the Bar Council to monitor Sangha and imposes a Rs.50,000 cost. Strict disciplinary measures will apply for any future similar offense.
