The Supreme Court today commenced a special week-long Lok Adalat, allowing media cameras inside courtrooms for the first time. Its aim is to settle pending cases and reduce backlog, with the first seven benches participating. The Chief Justice encouraged lawyers to bring suitable cases for amicable resolution, emphasizing the benefits of this informal, technology-driven method.
The Bombay High Court raised concerns about the Election Commission of India’s acquisition of open land for EVM storage, questioning the legality of the process and emphasizing the need to follow established procedures. Additionally, the court expressed apprehension that allowing such actions could set a precedent for further lawlessness. Two individuals opposed the proposed land use, prompting the court to schedule further consideration of the matter.
Today (25th April): The Kerala High Court has stayed the land acquisition notification for the proposed Sabarimala airport for two months, following a plea by a charitable trust and its managing trustee. The trust alleges that the acquisition process aimed to unlawfully acquire their property. The government emphasized the airport’s benefits for pilgrims and tourism.
The Supreme Court ruled against the State’s notion that providing compensation for land acquisition is an act of generosity, affirming citizens’ right to property. In response to a contempt case, the Court dismissed arguments that delay in compensation benefitted landowners, and left the option open for landowners to challenge the compensation award.
The Indian Supreme Court recently revived a 1987 land case, reflecting the persistence needed to navigate legal complexities. Despite setbacks and prolonged delays, the appellant’s determination led to the court’s decision. This pivotal move emphasizes the significance of timely justice and the judiciary’s role in upholding citizen rights.
In a remarkable decision, the Bombay High Court has set a precedent by excusing a 40-year delay in a case involving a litigant who approached the court against land acquisition. This decision underscores the principle that the State’s obligation to compensate cannot be negated by procedural delays. Also read- Bombay High Court Rebukes Sessions Judge […]
