Today, On 19th May, Supreme Court refuses to entertain Article 32 plea in Ayodhya land acquisition case against UP Housing Board. Tells petitioners to approach High Court: “If every state comes to SC, what will happen?”
Today, On 4th February, The Supreme Court rejected NHAI’s plea to apply the Tarsem Singh verdict on compensation for landowners prospectively. A Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh dismissed the request , stating that granting it would nullify the ruling. The Tarsem Singh judgment ensures fair compensation, and its retrospective application remains intact.
In a remarkable decision, the Bombay High Court has set a precedent by excusing a 40-year delay in a case involving a litigant who approached the court against land acquisition. This decision underscores the principle that the State’s obligation to compensate cannot be negated by procedural delays. Also read- Bombay High Court Rebukes Sessions Judge […]
