• Sun. Dec 21st, 2025
    • '

    Tag: lack of reasoning

    MP High Court Reduces Sentence of Man Convicted of Raping Mentally Disabled Minor
    High CourtLatest news

    MP High Court Reduces Sentence of Man Convicted of Raping Mentally Disabled Minor

    Madhya Pradesh: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently changed the punishment of Lalla Yadav, who was earlier sentenced to life imprisonment for raping a mentally underdeveloped minor. His sentence has now been reduced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. A division bench consisting of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Devnarayan Mishra from the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the judgment. The court considered some mitigating factors, including the fact that the accused is married and has four children to support.

    author
    [RSS Leader Srinivasan’s Murder] 'HC Made An Error By Granting Bail To 17 PFI Members Accused': Supreme Court
    [RSS Leader Srinivasan’s Murder] 'HC Made An Error By Granting Bail To 17 PFI Members Accused': Supreme Court
    Supreme Court

    [RSS Leader Srinivasan’s Murder] ‘HC Made An Error By Granting Bail To 17 PFI Members Without Considering Each Mistake’: Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court today (29th Nov) criticized the Kerala High Court for wrongly granting bail to 17 accused PFI members in a murder case tied to RSS leader Srinivasan, stating that individual roles were not assessed. It also demanded an explanation from the Supreme Court Registry for failing to list certain Special Leave Petitions by the NIA.

    author
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    High CourtLatest news

    ‘Judicial Decision Must Be Based on Legally Admissible Evidence, Not On Assumption’ : AP High Court Quashes Disciplinary Penalty on Police Constable

    The Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided by Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, quashed a disciplinary penalty on police constable G. Srikanth, citing lack of legally admissible evidence and procedural flaws in the inquiry process. The court emphasized that significant penalties require substantial proof and adherence to natural justice principles.

    author