The Supreme Court said Today (April 4) will examine if the Shahi Idgah mosque stands on ASI-protected land, which could exempt it from the Places of Worship Act. This major twist could reshape the Krishna Janmabhoomi legal battle.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court Extends Stay on Court-Monitored Survey of Shahi Idgah Mosque Complex](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Supreme-Court-Declines-to-Stay-Allahabad-HC-Order-on-Krishna-Janmabhoomi-Shahi-Eidgah-Mosque-Survey.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will hear the plea by Shahi Masjid Idgah’s management on January 15, challenging the Allahabad High Court’s rejection of its petition in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. The case focuses on the “religious character” of the disputed site, with Hindu parties seeking mosque removal, citing violations of the Places of Worship Act.
![[Gyanvapi Case] 'Utilize Non-Invasive Methodology': SC's 2023 Verdict Boosts Survey Orders for Disputed Sites](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-3-2.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in the Gyanvapi case legitimized surveys of disputed religious sites, providing a precedent for similar cases. The decision, permitting the Archaeological Survey of India to investigate the mosque complex, has incited claims over additional contested worship places, leading to escalating tensions and legal disputes across the country.
Today, On 4th September, The Muslim community appealed to the Supreme Court against an Allahabad High Court ruling that upheld the maintainability of lawsuits concerning the Shahi Idgah mosque dispute. The case involves legal challenges over the ownership and status of the mosque, which shares proximity with the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura. The upcoming Supreme Court decision will shape the future legal proceedings and negotiations between the involved parties.
In a legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, Hindu representatives reported missing property documents, complicating the case. The Hindu side challenges the Waqf Board’s ownership claim and the alleged compromise. The Muslim side argues the suit is time-barred. The High Court scheduled the next hearing for May 20. The case continues to draw attention.
Today, On 15th May, The Shahi Idgah dispute took on a new dimension as Hindu parties accused the Sunni Waqf Board of fraudulent representation in a 1968 compromise. They contested the ownership of the disputed land and raised questions about the mosque committee’s authority. The case’s outcome could have far-reaching implications for religious site management and communal harmony.
Today, On 7th May, The Allahabad High Court emphasized the impact of the Waqf Board in the Shahi Idgah dispute, addressing property ownership and religious rights. The case presents broader societal debates on religious sites and legal interpretations, shaping discussions on cultural heritage and communal harmony in India. The involvement of the Waqf Board and the court’s ruling add complexity to the matter, creating anticipation for the Supreme Court’s decision.