Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Karnataka tells Supreme Court that the Governor has only executive power and no legislative powers. Senior Advocate Gopal Subramaniam emphasized that any discretion of the Governor is clearly defined in the Constitution.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, The Supreme Court said that a Governor cannot just act like a postman or behave like a super legislature while examining the constitutional limits of a Governor’s powers under Article 200.
Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Kapil Sibal told the Supreme Court that a Governor cannot examine the legislative competence of Bills, stressing that any discretion must strictly come from the Constitution and not through arbitrary delays that undermine state legislatures.
Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
Today, on 2nd September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing West Bengal, said that the legislature’s sovereign acts cannot be implemented by the Executive. The Governor cannot withhold bills, and at no stage does the Executive possess legislative authority.
Today, On 2nd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, CJI Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court will not decide the matter based on which political dispensation is in power or was in power, stressing focus only on constitutional interpretation.
Today, On 2nd September, in the Presidential Reference Row, CJI B.R. Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court is not dealing with issues of individual States but only interpreting constitutional provisions, stressing the focus remains on legal questions under Articles 200 and 201.
Today, On 2nd September, in the Presidential Reference Row, CJI B.R. Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court is not dealing with issues of individual States but only interpreting constitutional provisions, stressing the focus remains on legal questions under Articles 200 and 201.
During the Presidential Reference on Governor and President’s powers, Abhishek Manu Singhvi compared Justice Krishna Iyer’s lyrical English to Shashi Tharoor’s dictionary-heavy style. The Chief Justice of India remarked that reactions on this comparison cannot be stopped.
Today, on 28th August, during the Presidential Reference hearing, Day 6, Tamil Nadu told the Supreme Court that the bill may be illegal, but the constitutional scheme will not change the binding nature of the aid and advice, reinforcing the state’s position on the Governor’s role in assent.
